linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: always respect QUEUE_FLAG_STABLE_WRITES on the block device
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:16:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFPacOW6XMq+o4YU@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504155556.t6byee6shgb27pw5@quack3>

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:55:56PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> For bdev address_space that's easy but what Ilya also mentioned is a
> problem when 'stable_write' flag gets toggled on the device and in that
> case having to propagate the flag update to all the address_space
> structures is a nightmare...

We have a number of flags which don't take effect when modified on a
block device with a mounted filesystem on it.  For example, modifying
the readahead settings do not change existing files, only new ones.
Since this flag is only modifiable for debugging purposes, I think I'm
OK with it not affecting already-mounted filesystems.  It feels like a
decision that reasonable people could disagree on, though.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-04 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-04 10:56 Ilya Dryomov
2023-05-04 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-04 14:16   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-04 15:07     ` Ilya Dryomov
2023-05-04 15:37       ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-04 15:55     ` Jan Kara
2023-05-04 16:16       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-05-04 23:07         ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-05 10:49           ` Jan Kara
2023-05-04 15:03   ` Ilya Dryomov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFPacOW6XMq+o4YU@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox