From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 18:25:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEwBcOdV1br94T5N@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425222446.170486-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:24:43PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> If format changes are not /sys/** ABI violating, heres 3 minor ones:
>
> 1st strips "age <increasing>" from output. This makes the output
> idempotent; unchanging until a new leak is reported.
>
> 2nd adds the backtrace.checksum to the "backtrace:" line. This lets a
> user see repeats without actually reading the whole backtrace. So now
> the backtrace line looks like this:
>
> backtrace (ck 603070071): # also see below
>
> Q: should ck be spelled crc ? it feels more communicative.
These all would make sense (and 'crc' sounds better) if they were done
from the start. I know there are test scripts out there parsing the
kmemleak sysfs file. I can't tell whether these changes would break
them.
Cc'ing Dmitry, I think syzbot was regularly checking kmemleak (not sure
it still does).
> NB: with ck exposed, it becomes possible to do a "selective clear",
> something like:
>
> echo drop 603070071 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>
> The 3rd patch takes __init off of kmemleak_test_init(). This fixes a
> bare-pointer in the 2nd line of the backtrace below, which previously
> looked like:
>
> [<00000000ef738764>] 0xffffffffc02350a2
>
> NB: this happens still/again, after rmmod kmemleak-test.
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff888005d9ca40 (size 32):
> comm "modprobe", pid 412, jiffies 4294703300
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 cd d9 05 80 88 ff ff 40 cf d9 05 80 88 ff ff ........@.......
> 14 a7 c4 f6 7d f9 87 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....}...........
> backtrace (ck 1354775490):
> [<000000002c474f61>] kmalloc_trace+0x26/0x90
> [<00000000b26599c1>] kmemleak_test_init+0x58/0x2d0 [kmemleak_test]
> [<0000000044d13990>] do_one_initcall+0x43/0x210
> [<00000000131bc505>] do_init_module+0x4a/0x210
> [<00000000b2902890>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x93/0xf0
> [<00000000673fdce2>] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80
> [<00000000357a2d80>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-28 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 22:24 Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] kmemleak: drop (age <increasing>) from leak record Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] kmemleak: add checksum to backtrace report Jim Cromie
2023-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] kmemleak-test: drop __init to get better backtrace Jim Cromie
2023-04-28 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-28 17:25 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-11-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] kmemleak report format changes jim.cromie
2023-11-16 17:56 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEwBcOdV1br94T5N@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox