linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Revert "android: binder: stop saving a pointer to the VMA"
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:17:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEmU8ULSEQhDVyX+@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425014328.d6vvimziv6je5xdg@revolver>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 09:43:28PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> * Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> [230424 19:11]:
> > 
> > The specifics are in the third patch of this patchset but the gist of it
> > is that during ->mmap() handler, binder will complete the initialization
> > of the binder_alloc structure. With the last step of this process being
> > the caching of the vma pointer. Since the ordering is protected with a
> > barrier we can then check alloc->vma to determine if the initialization
> > has been completed.
> > 
> > Since this check is part of the critical path for every single binder
> > transaction, the performance plummeted when we started contending for
> > the mmap_lock. In this particular case, binder doesn't actually use the
> > vma.
> 
> So why does binder_update_page_range() take the mmap_read_lock then use
> the cached vma in the reverted patch?
> 
> If you want to use it as a flag to see if the driver is initialized, why
> not use the cached address != 0?
> 
> Or better yet,
> 
> >It only needs to know if the internal structure has been fully
> > initialized and it is safe to use it.
> 
> This seems like a good reason to use your own rwsem.  This is,
> essentially, rolling your own lock with
> smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire() and a pointer which should not be
> cached.

We can't use an rwsem to protect the initialization. We already have an
alloc->mutex which would be an option. However, using it under ->mmap()
would only lead to dead-locks with the mmap_lock.

I agree with you that we could use some other flag instead of the vma
pointer to signal the initialization. I've actually tried several times
to come up with a scenario in which caching the vma pointer becomes an
issue to stop doing this altogether. However, I can't find anything
concrete.

I don't think the current solution in which we do all these unnecessary
vma lookups is correct. Instead, I'm currently working on a redesign of
this section in which binder stops to allocate/insert pages manually. We
should be making use of the page-fault handler and let the infra handle
all the work. The overall idea is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZEGh4mliGHvyWIvo@google.com/

It's hard to make the case for just dropping the vma pointer after ~15
years and take the performance hit without having an actual issue to
support this idea. So I'll revert this for now and keep working on the
page-fault solution.

Thanks Liam, I'll keep you in the loop.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-26 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230424205548.1935192-1-cmllamas@google.com>
     [not found] ` <20230424205548.1935192-2-cmllamas@google.com>
2023-04-24 22:34   ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-04-24 23:11     ` Carlos Llamas
2023-04-25  1:43       ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-04-26 21:17         ` Carlos Llamas [this message]
2023-05-18 14:40           ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-18 17:03             ` Carlos Llamas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZEmU8ULSEQhDVyX+@google.com \
    --to=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox