From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, vbabka@suse.cz, david@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page()
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:05:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEeXyZuTGT7CDuU7@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <060aab79-8170-56ad-797d-9d339f6c0b61@linux.alibaba.com>
On Tue 25-04-23 09:27:23, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 4/25/2023 8:22 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> writes:
[...]
> > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > index 6457b64fe562..bd124390c79b 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > @@ -1502,6 +1502,15 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> > > * interleaving within a single pageblock. It is therefore sufficient to check
> > > * the first and last page of a pageblock and avoid checking each individual
> > > * page in a pageblock.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note: the function may return non-NULL struct page even for a page block
> > > + * which contains a memory hole (i.e. there is no physical memory for a subset
> > > + * of the pfn range). For example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which
> > > + * will fall into 2 sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole
> > > + * even though the start pfn is online and valid. This should be safe most of
> > > + * the time because struct pages are still zero pre-filled and pfn walkers
> >
> > I don't think the pfn is just zero-filled even it's a hole. Can you
> > confirm that? In memmap_init() and memmap_init_zone_range(),
> > init_unavailable_range() is called to initialize the struct page.
>
> Yes, what I mean is the page frames were initialized to zero firstly, and
> some fields were initialized to default value. The "zero pre-filled" seems
> confusing, may be change to "initialized"?
Huang Ying is correct. Holes should have struct pages initialized and
init_unavailable_range actually marks those pages reserved. Which
is really good because they mean "do not touch unless this page is
yours". For some reason I thought those struct pages are simply zero
filled. I was clearly wrong. Maybe it would be good to reference
init_unavailable_range in the comment so that it is easier to track the
whole code path.
Sorry about that!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-25 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-24 13:45 [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/page_alloc: drop the unnecessary pfn_valid() for start pfn Baolin Wang
2023-04-24 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page() Baolin Wang
2023-04-24 14:47 ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-25 0:22 ` Huang, Ying
2023-04-25 1:27 ` Baolin Wang
2023-04-25 2:30 ` Huang, Ying
2023-04-25 9:05 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-04-25 12:29 ` Baolin Wang
2023-04-25 12:44 ` [PATCH v4] " Baolin Wang
2023-04-26 1:23 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEeXyZuTGT7CDuU7@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox