From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: david@redhat.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
petr.pavlu@suse.com, prarit@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, song@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, willy@infradead.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
colin.i.king@gmail.com, jim.cromie@gmail.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: add debugging auto-load duplicate module support
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:32:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEB6DmF+l3LVrpFI@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023041951-evolution-unwitting-1791@gregkh>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:15:11AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 01:46:36PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> You get 72 columns for changelog text, so you can use it :)
Sure! I forget what the limit is, but now I won't forget, new vimrc
settings:
set textwidth=100
autocmd FileType gitcommit set textwidth=72
set colorcolumn=+1
> > +config MODULE_AUTOLOAD_SUPRESS_DUPS
>
> MODULE_DEBUG_DUPLICATE perhaps? It has nothing to do with autoloading
> (other than that is what userspace is doing)
I refer to module auto-loading as the kernel's use of the *request_module()
APIs. This code is used by the module auto-loading request_module() API
callers, prior to us even dealing with userspace.
> and you aren't suppressing anything except throwing up warnings, right?
Actually the code does converge duplicate auto-loading requests into one, but'll
just rename to MODULE_DEBUG_AUTOLOAD_DUPS.
> > + bool "Debug duplicate modules with auto-loading"
> > + help
> > + Module autoloading allows in-kernel code to request modules through
> > + the *request_module*() API calls. This in turn just calls userspace
> > + modprobe. Although modprobe checks to see if a module is already
> > + loaded before trying to load a module there is a small time window in
> > + which multiple duplicate requests can end up in userspace and multiple
> > + modprobe calls race calling finit_module() around the same time for
> > + duplicate modules. The finit_module() system call can consume in the
> > + worst case more than twice the respective module size in virtual
> > + memory for each duplicate module requests. Although duplicate module
> > + requests are non-fatal virtual memory is a limited resource and each
> > + duplicate module request ends up just wasting virtual memory.
>
> It's not "wasted", as it is returned when the module is determined to be
> a duplicate. Otherwise everyone will want this enabled as they think it
> will actually save memory.
I'll change the language to be clear the issue is memory pressure early
on boot. I'll also add a bit of language to help at least guide people
to realize that the real value-add for this, ie, I'll have to mention we
suspect issue is udev and not module auto-loading and that this however
may still help find a few cases we can optimize for.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-18 20:46 Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-19 7:15 ` Greg KH
2023-04-19 23:32 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2023-04-20 5:32 ` Greg KH
2023-04-20 21:03 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-21 15:12 ` Greg KH
2023-04-21 16:42 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-21 17:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-21 18:31 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-21 18:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-26 10:13 ` Petr Pavlu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEB6DmF+l3LVrpFI@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox