* Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next? [not found] ` <CAOQ4uxgUOuR80jsAE2DkZhMPVNT_WwnsSX8-GSkZO4=k3VbCsw@mail.gmail.com> @ 2023-04-19 3:34 ` Matthew Wilcox 2023-04-19 4:02 ` Amir Goldstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2023-04-19 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Darrick J. Wong, lsf-pc, linux-fsdevel, xfs, linux-ext4, linux-btrfs, Martin K. Petersen, linux-mm On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote: > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are we > > spending too much time on LTS? How on earth do we prioritize projects > > with all these drive by bots?? Why can't we support large engineering > > efforts better???) than technical. > > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)". > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big room > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want. Would this make sense to include the MM folks as well? Certainly MM has made the same choice as XFS ("No automatic backports, we will cc: stable on patches that make sense"). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next? 2023-04-19 3:34 ` [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next? Matthew Wilcox @ 2023-04-19 4:02 ` Amir Goldstein 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Amir Goldstein @ 2023-04-19 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Darrick J. Wong, lsf-pc, linux-fsdevel, xfs, linux-ext4, linux-btrfs, Martin K. Petersen, linux-mm, Chandan Babu R On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 6:34 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote: > > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are we > > > spending too much time on LTS? How on earth do we prioritize projects > > > with all these drive by bots?? Why can't we support large engineering > > > efforts better???) than technical. > > > > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)". > > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big room > > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want. > > Would this make sense to include the MM folks as well? Certainly MM > has made the same choice as XFS ("No automatic backports, we will cc: > stable on patches that make sense"). Yeh that makes sense. Added MM to that session. Thanks, Amir. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-19 4:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Y/5ovz6HI2Z47jbk@magnolia>
[not found] ` <CAOQ4uxj6mNbGQBSpg-KpSiDa2UugBFXki4HhM4DPvXeAQMnRWg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20230418044641.GD360881@frogsfrogsfrogs>
[not found] ` <CAOQ4uxgUOuR80jsAE2DkZhMPVNT_WwnsSX8-GSkZO4=k3VbCsw@mail.gmail.com>
2023-04-19 3:34 ` [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next? Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-19 4:02 ` Amir Goldstein
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox