Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: do not increment pgfault stats when page fault handler retries

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:19:40AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:47:57PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:26 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 05:08:18PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > @@ -5223,8 +5230,8 @@ vm_fault_t handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > > >               if (task_in_memcg_oom(current) && !(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> > > >                       mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(false);
> > > >       }
> > > > -
> > > > -     mm_account_fault(regs, address, flags, ret);
> > > > +out:
> > > > +     mm_account_fault(mm, regs, address, flags, ret);
> > >
> > > Ah, one more question.. can this cached mm race with a destroying mm (just
> > > like the vma race we wanted to avoid)?  Still a question only applies to
> > > COMPLETE case when mmap read lock can be released.  Thanks,
> > 
> > I believe that is impossible because whoever is calling the page fault
> > handler has stabilized the mm by getting a refcount.
> 
> Do you have a hint on where that refcount is taken?

... when we called clone()?  A thread by definition has a reference to
its own mm.

> Btw, it's definitely not a question sololy for this patch but a more common
> question to the page fault path.  It's just that when I wanted to look for
> any refcount boost (which I also expect to have somewhere) I didn't really
> see that in current path (e.g. do_user_addr_fault() for x86_64).
> 
> I also had a quick look on do_exit() but I also didn't see where do we
> e.g. wait for all the threads to stop before recycles a mm.
> 
> I had a feeling that I must have missed something, but just want to make
> sure it's the case.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu
>