linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Justin Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 10:22:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCvQGJzdED+An8an@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFxkdAr5C7ggZ+WdvDbsfmwuXujT_z_x3qcUnhnCn-WrAurvgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:55:37AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:09 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> >
> > It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
> > management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
> > those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand
> > implications of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and
> > ranges don't help here.
> >
> > Drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and make its prompt
> > visible only if EXPERT=y
> 
> I do not like suddenly hiding this behind EXPERT for a couple of
> reasons.  Most importantly, it will silently change the config for
> users building with an old kernel config.  If a user has for instance
> "13" set and building with 4K pages, as is the current configuration
> for Fedora and RHEL aarch64 builds, an oldconfig build will now set it
> to 10 with no indication that it is doing so.  And while I think that
> 10 is a fine default for many aarch64 users, there are valid reasons
> for choosing other values. Putting this behind expert makes it much
> less obvious that this is an option.

That's the idea of EXPERT, no?

This option was intended to allow allocation of huge pages for
architectures that had PMD_ORDER > MAX_ORDER and not to allow user to
select size of maximal physically contiguous allocation.

Changes to MAX_ORDER fundamentally change the behaviour of core mm and
unless users *really* know what they are doing there is no reason to choose
non-default values so hiding this option behind EXPERT seems totally
appropriate to me.
 
> Justin
> 
> > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +---
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index e60baf7859d1..7324032af859 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -1487,11 +1487,9 @@ config XEN
> >  # 16K |       27          |      14      |       13        |         11         |
> >  # 64K |       29          |      16      |       13        |         13         |
> >  config ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
> > -       int "Maximum zone order" if ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES
> > +       int "Maximum zone order" if EXPERT && (ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES)
> >         default "13" if ARM64_64K_PAGES
> > -       range 11 13 if ARM64_16K_PAGES
> >         default "11" if ARM64_16K_PAGES
> > -       range 10 15 if ARM64_4K_PAGES
> >         default "10"
> >         help
> >           The kernel memory allocator divides physically contiguous memory
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
> >

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-25  6:08 [PATCH v3 00/14] arch,mm: cleanup Kconfig entries for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] arm: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-03-29 15:55   ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-04  7:22     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2023-04-04 11:50       ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-12 17:27         ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-18 22:05           ` Andrew Morton
2023-04-19 11:05             ` Catalin Marinas
2023-04-19 11:27               ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-25 16:09             ` Justin Forbes
2023-04-27 13:40               ` Catalin Marinas
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] arm64: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] csky: drop ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] ia64: don't allow users to override ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:38   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-04-19  8:56     ` Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] m68k: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] nios2: " Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] nios2: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] powerpc: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] powerpc: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] sh: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] sh: drop ranges for definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] sparc: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text Mike Rapoport
2023-03-25  6:08 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] xtensa: " Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCvQGJzdED+An8an@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jforbes@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox