From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)" <Qun-wei.Lin@mediatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"surenb@google.com" <surenb@google.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"Chinwen Chang (張錦文)" <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"Kuan-Ying Lee (李冠穎)" <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>,
"Casper Li (李中榮)" <casper.li@mediatek.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Usersapce MTE error with allocation tag 0 when low on memory
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:36:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCXIiCtjFt19wBAM@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f468f934-40b6-3547-d3ea-88a0aac5bd6a@arm.com>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:55:49AM +0000, Qun-wei Lin (林群崴) wrote:
> >> Having compared the differences between Kernel-5.15 and Kernel-6.1,
> >> We found the order of swap_free() and set_pte_at() is changed in
> >> do_swap_page().
> >>
> >> When fault in, do_swap_page() will call swap_free() first:
> >> do_swap_page() -> swap_free() -> __swap_entry_free() ->
> >> free_swap_slot() -> swapcache_free_entries() -> swap_entry_free() ->
> >> swap_range_free() -> arch_swap_invalidate_page() ->
> >> mte_invalidate_tags_area() -> mte_invalidate_tags() -> xa_erase()
> >>
> >> and then call set_pte_at():
> >> do_swap_page() -> set_pte_at() -> __set_pte_at() -> mte_sync_tags() ->
> >> mte_sync_page_tags() -> mte_restore_tags() -> xa_load()
> >>
> >> This means that the swap slot is invalidated before pte mapping, and
> >> this will cause the mte tag in XArray to be released before tag
> >> restore.
>
> This analysis looks correct to me. The MTE swap code works on the
> assumption that the set_pte_at() will restore the tags to the page
> before the swap entry is removed. The reordering which has happened
> since has broken this assumption and as you observed can cause the tags
> to be unavailable by the time set_pte_at() is called.
>
> >> After I moved swap_free() to the next line of set_pte_at(), the problem
> >> is disappeared.
> >>
> >> We suspect that the following patches, which have changed the order, do
> >> not consider the mte tag restoring in page fault flow:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220131162940.210846-5-david@redhat.com/
>
> I'm not sure I entirely follow the reasoning in this patch, so I'm not
> sure whether it's safe to just move swap_free() down to below
> set_pte_at() or if that reintroduces the information leak.
>
> I also wonder if sparc has a similar issue as the arch_do_swap()
> callback is located next to set_pte_at().
SPARC has a potential race here since the page is made visible to the
user but the tags are not restored yet (I raised this before). But even
ignoring this small window, arch_do_swap() needs to have the metadata
available.
> >> Any suggestion is appreciated.
>
> The other possibility is to add a(nother) callback for MTE in
> arch_do_swap() that calls mte_restore_tags() on the page before the
> swap_free() call rather than depending on the hook in set_pte_at().
I think we should move arch_do_swap_page() earlier before swap_free()
and in arm64 we copy the tags to pte_page(pte). I don't think SPARC
would have any issues with this change (and it also fixes their race).
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-29 2:55 Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)
2023-03-29 15:59 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-03-29 16:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-03-30 13:56 ` Steven Price
2023-03-30 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCXIiCtjFt19wBAM@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=Qun-wei.Lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=casper.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox