From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1E9C35FF3 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 04:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 81256280002; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:53:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7C1CF280001; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:53:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 689BF280002; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:53:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CE7280001 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:53:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F87161C72 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 04:53:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83244339696.20.E2A31CA Received: from mail-qv1-f42.google.com (mail-qv1-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655CF180004 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 04:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gourry.net header.s=google header.b=lRgf9upR; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of gourry@gourry.net designates 209.85.219.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gourry@gourry.net; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1742532806; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=nbzLWCTpNb9s8l8woW8btRsfZA3DuSpJz7B/kKMTLr4=; b=ggLDULOYiTOfizNM7+MVJ577vo/A9iKcRYaWCHlzQgf5morbfw2MKj0/3wR2tKji/gXO57 1XWNVliJCsYdg4J8Q3q1Tz9yBqF7l72O8JmoM5PGBaaiX+GcZLSc1+Cwio+BX74zFs4mcV GWIDVTR8613OLyMPaGoUC8HVIyA4dYg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gourry.net header.s=google header.b=lRgf9upR; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of gourry@gourry.net designates 209.85.219.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gourry@gourry.net; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1742532806; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SKSIpzJB2QI0gUor3TLp9Hyr15F525Ce0bMzv08+eE/HWvlmumuduuq0zUfqjn/CwMTQgS AHop+WxdjZIK1ol/+b9e4N0KWTR3M9Wdfc4n2EMbKNuii3sY5mp+OByCjHpG+IinxyFiyZ bKIf7IBhOdD2zDfaVuyUjH2IZW6one8= Received: by mail-qv1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e8f6970326so13877956d6.0 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:53:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gourry.net; s=google; t=1742532805; x=1743137605; darn=kvack.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nbzLWCTpNb9s8l8woW8btRsfZA3DuSpJz7B/kKMTLr4=; b=lRgf9upRGOPT7KVM2yLPuDCHqPR0HawZnrJnSrKw8eiBzF2UryxEsoaZZQyPXZt/sZ K9Q7l037lWFn6UZXEyHb5DHsS2Xc1PR7Pv/AvL1CqRsExg6fYBLLElLj036qTdsKY0WP sqwOQyDIj3X2jVnXA3vj23AIMsvdL/NGbE0DVfOKTW70Pt5uyQAmosDT/VypGE6Y2S1h 3ICLdaK+YKf4shMsI50/pLTSCDK/e4LNafSIB4zoqJkimAoc1apRlYp6T/ZG7qLfokMS EEWqFSclsUwCWrH3J5qVIemyG/oOWLibDonWB0T7rLEElS9gmSjo+fqornrwv2wsIrUp xUcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742532805; x=1743137605; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nbzLWCTpNb9s8l8woW8btRsfZA3DuSpJz7B/kKMTLr4=; b=kUIsf/Www+nn4vZsXmEZGCpdVDXFuX3SxuSlQ5qz1l73GjSdRN8zh+3fx9hKhvvXg/ 8p7wNxLjikSj1/ci8BuS0oNrOoKAroIRwHRpxroQs+Drbxiu9QSkrQTcTcFW3vA2PyYw qRJjS2rikgYtCg2YrcDGprqCxgnBGhgZHeGQoceMiyBF4zYfA5qkGzmCHz29CjrZceVx tCXp0+M95mhgwt+73zxqi4TxLYFSnkSPBgRIWO45aNDyqjEZwijRr2RTLdxz1dMt40Y5 qOYpdmp3Ohj8TzHlQX9lOdJ3bjujndHeJW/PdYT0/btX55oXxx4Vgwr3japQTfPHxSej tubg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVrU3VAXfJ5m6p/AlkYmOL4VK9McffPLWClMdkG0Zee1XhHvYAK1q8wEq8lFcQfg9SfRA9RwfDhYQ==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwIWKCMK/KMPFF2+30XlNHONXLCmBi6IwGbYSi+5ZUDI+4Lkzt8 VEiK2rzRmLgrbsOQ/EeIrZ0g4quVAkQfxSI03pbvIC/yQw6pZxCtXqKY60YrPW8= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvn+Qweq6gY3WkhIERE1li7OKm+pclTn9ftjSaG3c/6FEeFcRSfEIdZbHxY1n+ lWIiL+OsgT0tGMYbKvVq9n+8rGCHe6Ey3CyxUyp/D9eCp6xE08MJ77Z0yrvFWspVQhQ8bp2j7ng jP4sYSRvSQYpE4E7T9ja9zGCioBVndAWg/7rgFempPCklAFWkfSqmfcAIEPakZwJbjwLLHWgLmE ai9AHHHrp6m8MYPBH8nRkg+1y501d0t6lGR7tcjHORbVXbgtKDQDhVHGixav+nFBCpwwnKmjNAG JTl564UEMMut9svuOfh/nHpQhdMOPA7lfgOgyhtLAPCcti5apb0TZf4Qd0KhXHuSjirxYocqfkH f626SHDW9ItRanGuw4qzi/E0scVE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVL/LUMypx3aMhAzZdqNqW3DtQ7i5EEKUs3LjZvTQziSUDTdQgaVCU0DtLDh9wUbOPLCMkLA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20c8:b0:6e1:6c94:b5c5 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6eb3f26e984mr33048466d6.4.1742532805513; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F (pool-173-79-56-208.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.79.56.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6eb3ef1f5d8sm6903586d6.45.2025.03.20.21.53.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:53:23 -0400 From: Gregory Price To: Rakie Kim Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, david@redhat.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, kernel_team@skhynix.com, honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in weighted interleave sysfs Message-ID: References: <20250321043701.928-1-rakie.kim@sk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250321043701.928-1-rakie.kim@sk.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 655CF180004 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Stat-Signature: i19rzjaf3gi9bngk343c5ge8pzaiozcn X-HE-Tag: 1742532806-952399 X-HE-Meta: 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 SWLerblB TYMRvQGkfPldapctN1Dqbq/CAAbvUsRz4CHwATcgT01VyB3VXZZYcLjJLE37MC7k1FRQ7Qz+xP4N7/EOrhHcWVUUyIw+Sy9DQIO9Q5gX/nI2i4LHenL5s77vmxKg2QJiTc3tVtUpjLS20e5T6x5AjFdiCn0asFmYWGJmQ3FjZRq3u44ogTJXCyOCUX9smcC040mgJJ+N1u64/zfK0W8IL7Go6oDVg8Edwh0Bi7HtmHO5R8jny1uA8XQEkiquP+YPEjnzTBee9a/asTTk1+lXpExZTJv63dwk3V247AhlPSeA1qq36zij+tklyMkyxqTYknKhNnpa8IUnw87bvF0X/X3YOnHfZI5TmMZzitkhKSNpEjSg30vJ+F63byNpxsQzieOoRa+j6EAq4rE53VPD3jOY3EA== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000301, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 01:36:55PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote: > > Patch 1 and Patch 2 are closely related, and I believe that both patches > need to be combined to fully support the functionality. > > Initially, I thought that Patch 1 was the fix for the original issue and > considered it the candidate for a backport. > However, upon further reflection, I believe that all changes in Patch 1 > through Patch 3 are necessary to fully address the underlying problem. > > Therefore, I now think it makes more sense to merge Patch 1 and Patch 2 > into a single patch, then renumber the current Patch 3 as Patch 2, > and treat the entire set as a proper -stable backport candidate. > > I'd appreciate your thoughts on this suggestion. > > Rakie > All of this is fine, but it doesn't fix the bug in LTS kernels :] It would be nice to do that too, since you identified it. ~Gregory