From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
leon@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
axboe@kernel.dk, joro@8bytes.org, brauner@kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
da.gomez@samsung.com, kernel@pankajraghav.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] blkdev: lift BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE to page cache limit
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:27:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9xB4kZiZfSdFJfV@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33c1dab-a0f6-4c36-8732-182f640eff52@acm.org>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:15:23AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The patch description mentions what has been changed but does not
> mention why. Shouldn't the description of this patch explain why this
> change has been made? Shouldn't the description of this patch explain
> for which applications this change is useful?
The manufacturer chooses the block size. If they've made a bad decision,
their device will presumably not sell well. We don't need to justify
their decision in the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 11:13 [RFC 0/4] nvme-pci: breaking the 512 KiB max IO boundary Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-20 11:13 ` [RFC 1/4] iomap: use BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE for the iomap zero page Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-20 11:13 ` [RFC 2/4] blkdev: lift BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE to page cache limit Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-20 16:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-20 16:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-20 16:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-20 16:27 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2025-03-20 16:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-20 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-24 10:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-24 15:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-20 11:13 ` [RFC 3/4] nvme-pci: bump segments to what the device can use Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-20 11:13 ` [RFC 4/4] nvme-pci: add quirk for qemu with bogus NOWS Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9xB4kZiZfSdFJfV@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox