From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B91C35FFF for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CFB4A28000F; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:24:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CA780280001; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:24:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B4B3C28000F; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:24:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996D3280001 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:24:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C739580603 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:24:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83239277226.19.1F52A98 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF456100011 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=febyWxe8; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1742412271; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SyAHSh3YlcgMHzL1HNJXHjFLgIvALCPJ2+kPKzyl4F4pRAiznuCTozttfX39QE/bKwUGVg rf6PzHAhae8v2zjRoOiYO9jHX3yauRHrPvGK+J5nD1hi4mccgdhLJGdH4x9p4ftS/0T5bi LIoT4hVGC9P+zW0NlgosCCV9gKujd4E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=febyWxe8; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1742412271; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=EpQOjPVa2Beq04kJvvraeY6xvIQbVVFWRl2dfYg/9BQ=; b=IgDN6PrNBxyMsFtiqGWXSmqGhut6t9EJol0qGZMxoyxXFb0n1ISx+aZJSJ6EYBBTnpW3Q7 wNILrfLyRVFGQ5iOIJx20z4Yan6O6noeTWXCl6i8JG7sfjwuXQ605jcHu9TxoQ7/0+uQ6i hsilUjImECRP6FL0qcYcaDDdCcjhnX4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=EpQOjPVa2Beq04kJvvraeY6xvIQbVVFWRl2dfYg/9BQ=; b=febyWxe8indQHW+/DXNc8XwTh7 pCXPazgrVQb1NC7evVDOPeSQltfuqysNWTFC5oJj3WPOzEA2aD6iRliRra4uBuFJ13mq7UTwbfs/V z1n1JUECWHCnmeAomv/S7mWQSA6v0rTDYeF62tAa69tKTTbrMJVuphq3P82FjqMbUN/5W76Abd2cl dQpsiF2P9sTan1YH5XPb0LA41V4TPkJ9iNxITxRbCovvgb9tJLA4x84vbYEPWobTccY1GzwbBVd3R CjZnVFu71PRuIuEfbzM8Ubd7coSD1oeTCHb8fqZBuDXWVeLlruLDcwvqw6RonAk2AcdNTu4qbyLeL pMlxg84A==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tuz1c-0000000E0QD-02eg; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:24:24 +0000 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:24:23 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Jan Kara , Oliver Sang , David Hildenbrand , Alistair Popple , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner , Hannes Reinecke , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, John Garry , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it, Pankaj Raghav , Daniel Gomez , David Bueso Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [block/bdev] 3c20917120: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c Message-ID: References: <202503101536.27099c77-lkp@intel.com> <20250311-testphasen-behelfen-09b950bbecbf@brauner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EF456100011 X-Stat-Signature: gwyiyciqn4gb3xxb8ztgfh1jygwtzin8 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1742412270-683475 X-HE-Meta: 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 zqSovGKB tT3LvIxX87xQGVKN77tlO7ZIuLb5a5mVFReURXeIiNRgrrcNOqPcyGBAns7L9BmFbOA0eXNXKx1i3GYCbMUbXSY2ixGIhySoWGhHV37VKwx07Z5S2RHJQR4yYteCn2mvvPfNUBilkOFWrXKkvauM/okFvl87toUgL4V+U4x2s2U50zIv1NQwudjiWoqas0S1qBwkqAsJqlU1i35nE8mJG+GVcX+XzpxW6ijDAG1uP84UJBCCIDZmMOHah5cNLU3N63ix1N5aL/qtJnEkKbJwhHQZVPg== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:16:41PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:55:11AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > FWIW, I'm not seeing this crash or any kernel splat within the > > same time (I'll let this run the full 2.5 hours now to verify) on > > vanilla 6.14.0-rc3 + the 64k-sector-size patches, which would explain why I > > hadn't seen this in my earlier testing over 10 ext4 profiles on fstests. This > > particular crash seems likely to be an artifact on the development cycle on > > next-20250317. > > I confirm that with a vanilla 6.14.0-rc3 + the 64k-sector-size patches a 2.5 > hour run generic/750 doesn't crash at all. So indeed something on the > development cycle leads to this particular crash. We can't debug two problems at once. FOr the first problem, I've demonstrated what the cause is, and that's definitely introduced by your patch, so we need to figure out a solution. For the second problem, we don't know what it is. Do you want to bisect it to figure out which commit introduced it?