linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] memcg: decouple drain_obj_stock from local stock
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:44:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9jB2DFVY2R99ekS@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250315174930.1769599-3-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 10:49:23AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Currently drain_obj_stock() can potentially call __refill_stock which
> accesses local cpu stock and thus requires memcg stock's local_lock.
> However if we look at the code paths leading to drain_obj_stock(), there
> is never a good reason to refill the memcg stock at all from it.
> 
> At the moment, drain_obj_stock can be called from reclaim, hotplug cpu
> teardown, mod_objcg_state() and refill_obj_stock(). For reclaim and
> hotplug there is no need to refill. For the other two paths, most
> probably the newly switched objcg would be used in near future and thus
> no need to refill stock with the older objcg.
> 
> In addition, __refill_stock() from drain_obj_stock() happens on rare
> cases, so performance is not really an issue. Let's just uncharge
> directly instead of refill which will also decouple drain_obj_stock from
> local cpu stock and local_lock requirements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-18  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-15 17:49 [PATCH 0/9] memcg: cleanup per-cpu stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] memcg: remove root memcg check from refill_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  0:39   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-18  7:59   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-21 16:55     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] memcg: decouple drain_obj_stock from local stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  0:44   ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] memcg: introduce memcg_uncharge Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  0:50   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] memcg: manually inline __refill_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  0:58   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-18  7:58     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] memcg: no refilling stock from obj_cgroup_release Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  1:06   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] memcg: do obj_cgroup_put inside drain_obj_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  1:07   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] memcg: use __mod_memcg_state in drain_obj_stock Shakeel Butt
2025-03-17 20:56   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-17 21:54     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  8:02       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-18  1:13   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-18  7:50     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] memcg: combine slab obj stock charging and accounting Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  1:20   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-15 17:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] memcg: manually inline replace_stock_objcg Shakeel Butt
2025-03-18  1:21   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-18  8:00   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-16  3:57 ` [PATCH 0/9] memcg: cleanup per-cpu stock Andrew Morton
2025-03-16  4:43   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-16 15:59   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-17 18:11     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-17 20:27     ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-02 20:40 ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9jB2DFVY2R99ekS@google.com \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox