From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, kernel_team@skhynix.com,
honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: Enable sysfs support for memory hotplug in weighted interleave
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:14:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9Gy-No6pXFWZAyc@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312075628.648-3-rakie.kim@sk.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:56:26PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote:
> Previously, sysfs entries for weighted interleave were only created during
> initialization, preventing dynamically added memory nodes from being recognized.
>
> This patch enables sysfs registration for nodes added via memory hotplug,
> allowing weighted interleave settings to be updated as the system memory
> configuration changes.
>
In patch 2 you said:
```
With this enhancement, the weighted interleave policy now properly supports
memory hotplug, ensuring that newly added nodes are recognized and sysfs
entries are created accordingly.
```
By description, this claims to accomplish functionally the same thing
patch 2 claim.
The code below actually does two things:
1) Refactors the sysfs code to break out the weighted_interleave group
into a global that can be referenced by the hotplug callback.
2) The change the the memory hotplug callback to add/remove nodes.
Move the refactor work out ahead in a separate patch to make it easier
to review the changes individually please.
> Signed-off-by: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 94efff89e0be..71aff1276d4d 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -3389,6 +3389,13 @@ struct iw_node_attr {
> int nid;
> };
>
> +struct iw_node_group {
> + struct kobject *wi_kobj;
> + struct iw_node_attr **nattrs;
> +};
> +
> +static struct iw_node_group *ngrp;
> +
for a global, this should have a more descriptive name.
And since this actually represents the weighted_interleave sysfs entry,
it should maybe be `sysfs_wi_group`? Since it will include more than
just nodes (e.g. the upcoming `auto`)
> static ssize_t node_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> @@ -3431,24 +3438,22 @@ static ssize_t node_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> return count;
> }
>
> -static struct iw_node_attr **node_attrs;
> -
> -static void sysfs_wi_node_release(struct iw_node_attr *node_attr,
> - struct kobject *parent)
> +static void sysfs_wi_node_release(int nid)
> {
> - if (!node_attr)
> + if (!ngrp->nattrs[nid])
> return;
> - sysfs_remove_file(parent, &node_attr->kobj_attr.attr);
> - kfree(node_attr->kobj_attr.attr.name);
> - kfree(node_attr);
> +
> + sysfs_remove_file(ngrp->wi_kobj, &ngrp->nattrs[nid]->kobj_attr.attr);
> + kfree(ngrp->nattrs[nid]->kobj_attr.attr.name);
> + kfree(ngrp->nattrs[nid]);
> }
>
> static void sysfs_wi_release(struct kobject *wi_kobj)
> {
> - int i;
> + int nid;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
> - sysfs_wi_node_release(node_attrs[i], wi_kobj);
> + for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++)
> + sysfs_wi_node_release(nid);
> kobject_put(wi_kobj);
> }
>
> @@ -3457,7 +3462,7 @@ static const struct kobj_type wi_ktype = {
> .release = sysfs_wi_release,
> };
>
> -static int add_weight_node(int nid, struct kobject *wi_kobj)
> +static int sysfs_wi_node_add(int nid)
> {
> struct iw_node_attr *node_attr;
> char *name;
> @@ -3479,19 +3484,17 @@ static int add_weight_node(int nid, struct kobject *wi_kobj)
> node_attr->kobj_attr.store = node_store;
> node_attr->nid = nid;
>
> - if (sysfs_create_file(wi_kobj, &node_attr->kobj_attr.attr)) {
> + if (sysfs_create_file(ngrp->wi_kobj, &node_attr->kobj_attr.attr)) {
> kfree(node_attr->kobj_attr.attr.name);
> kfree(node_attr);
> pr_err("failed to add attribute to weighted_interleave\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - node_attrs[nid] = node_attr;
> + ngrp->nattrs[nid] = node_attr;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -struct kobject *wi_kobj;
> -
> static int wi_node_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long action, void *data)
> {
> @@ -3504,15 +3507,15 @@ static int wi_node_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>
> switch(action) {
> case MEM_ONLINE:
> - err = add_weight_node(nid, wi_kobj);
> + err = sysfs_wi_node_add(nid);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("failed to add sysfs [node%d]\n", nid);
> - kobject_put(wi_kobj);
> + kobject_put(ngrp->wi_kobj);
> return NOTIFY_BAD;
> }
> break;
> case MEM_OFFLINE:
> - sysfs_wi_node_release(node_attrs[nid], wi_kobj);
> + sysfs_wi_node_release(nid);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -3524,14 +3527,14 @@ static int add_weighted_interleave_group(struct kobject *root_kobj)
> {
> int nid, err;
>
> - wi_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kobject), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!wi_kobj)
> + ngrp->wi_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kobject), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ngrp->wi_kobj)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - err = kobject_init_and_add(wi_kobj, &wi_ktype, root_kobj,
> + err = kobject_init_and_add(ngrp->wi_kobj, &wi_ktype, root_kobj,
> "weighted_interleave");
> if (err) {
> - kfree(wi_kobj);
> + kfree(ngrp->wi_kobj);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -3539,7 +3542,7 @@ static int add_weighted_interleave_group(struct kobject *root_kobj)
> if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY))
> continue;
>
> - err = add_weight_node(nid, wi_kobj);
> + err = sysfs_wi_node_add(nid);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("failed to add sysfs [node%d]\n", nid);
> goto err_out;
> @@ -3550,7 +3553,7 @@ static int add_weighted_interleave_group(struct kobject *root_kobj)
> return 0;
>
> err_out:
> - kobject_put(wi_kobj);
> + kobject_put(ngrp->wi_kobj);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -3565,7 +3568,9 @@ static void mempolicy_kobj_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> mutex_unlock(&iw_table_lock);
> synchronize_rcu();
> kfree(old);
> - kfree(node_attrs);
> +
> + kfree(ngrp->nattrs);
> + kfree(ngrp);
> kfree(kobj);
> }
>
> @@ -3578,17 +3583,23 @@ static int __init mempolicy_sysfs_init(void)
> int err;
> static struct kobject *mempolicy_kobj;
>
> - node_attrs = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(struct iw_node_attr *),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!node_attrs) {
> + ngrp = kzalloc(sizeof(*ngrp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ngrp) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_out;
> }
>
> + ngrp->nattrs = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(struct iw_node_attr *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ngrp->nattrs) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto ngrp_out;
> + }
> +
> mempolicy_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(*mempolicy_kobj), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mempolicy_kobj) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto node_out;
> + goto nattr_out;
> }
>
> err = kobject_init_and_add(mempolicy_kobj, &mempolicy_ktype, mm_kobj,
> @@ -3606,12 +3617,13 @@ static int __init mempolicy_sysfs_init(void)
>
> return 0;
>
> -node_out:
> - kfree(node_attrs);
> +nattr_out:
> + kfree(ngrp->nattrs);
> +ngrp_out:
> + kfree(ngrp);
> err_out:
> pr_err("mempolicy sysfs structure failed to initialize\n");
> return err;
> -
> }
>
> late_initcall(mempolicy_sysfs_init);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 7:56 [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in mempolicy_sysfs_init() Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: Support memory hotplug in weighted interleave Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 16:03 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-13 6:33 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 16:23 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-13 22:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-14 6:00 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-14 9:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-17 8:23 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: Enable sysfs support for " Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 16:14 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-03-13 6:34 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 16:40 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-14 6:35 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix duplicate node addition in sysfs for " Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 15:04 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-13 6:34 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 16:42 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-14 6:35 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 15:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in mempolicy_sysfs_init() Gregory Price
2025-03-13 6:31 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 15:52 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-14 7:44 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-14 10:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-14 13:42 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-17 8:24 ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-17 8:24 ` Rakie Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9Gy-No6pXFWZAyc@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox