linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, kernel_team@skhynix.com,
	honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in mempolicy_sysfs_init()
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:49:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9Gs8i1FhJJ0eaiA@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312075628.648-1-rakie.kim@sk.com>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:56:24PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote:
> Improper cleanup of sysfs attributes caused kobject and memory leaks when
> initialization failed or nodes were removed.
> 
> This patch ensures proper deallocation of kobjects and memory, preventing
> resource leaks and improving stability.
>

This patch does multiple things, please split these changes into
multiple patches.

> Fixes: dce41f5ae253 ("mm/mempolicy: implement the sysfs-based weighted_interleave interface")
> Signed-off-by: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
> ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index bbaadbeeb291..1691748badb2 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -3541,39 +3541,40 @@ static int __init mempolicy_sysfs_init(void)
>  	int err;
>  	static struct kobject *mempolicy_kobj;
>  
> -	mempolicy_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(*mempolicy_kobj), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!mempolicy_kobj) {
> +	node_attrs = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(struct iw_node_attr *),
> +			     GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!node_attrs) {
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
> -	node_attrs = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(struct iw_node_attr *),
> -			     GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!node_attrs) {
> +	mempolicy_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(*mempolicy_kobj), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!mempolicy_kobj) {
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto mempol_out;
> +		goto node_out;
>  	}

It's not clear to me why you re-ordered these allocations, it seems
superfluous.

>  
>  	err = kobject_init_and_add(mempolicy_kobj, &mempolicy_ktype, mm_kobj,
>  				   "mempolicy");
> -	if (err)
> -		goto node_out;
> +	if (err) {
> +		kobject_put(mempolicy_kobj);

Is this correct? If kobject_init_and_add fails, from other examples we
need only free the mempolicy_kobj - because it failed to initialize and
therefore should not have any references.  I think this causes an
underflow.

> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
>  
>  	err = add_weighted_interleave_group(mempolicy_kobj);
>  	if (err) {
> -		pr_err("mempolicy sysfs structure failed to initialize\n");
>  		kobject_put(mempolicy_kobj);
> -		return err;
> +		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
> -	return err;
> +	return 0;
> +

Please keep functional changes and refactors separate.  There's more
churn in this patch than is needed to accomplish what the changelog
states is the intent.

>  node_out:
>  	kfree(node_attrs);
> -mempol_out:
> -	kfree(mempolicy_kobj);
>  err_out:
> -	pr_err("failed to add mempolicy kobject to the system\n");
> +	pr_err("mempolicy sysfs structure failed to initialize\n");
>  	return err;
> +
>  }
>  
>  late_initcall(mempolicy_sysfs_init);
> 
> base-commit: 80e54e84911a923c40d7bee33a34c1b4be148d7a
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-12  7:56 Rakie Kim
2025-03-12  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: Support memory hotplug in weighted interleave Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 16:03   ` Gregory Price
2025-03-13  6:33     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 16:23       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-13 22:36         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-14  6:00           ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-14  9:17             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-17  8:23               ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-12  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: Enable sysfs support for " Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 16:14   ` Gregory Price
2025-03-13  6:34     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 16:40       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-14  6:35         ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-12  7:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix duplicate node addition in sysfs for " Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 15:04   ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-13  6:34     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 16:42   ` Gregory Price
2025-03-14  6:35     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-12 15:49 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-03-13  6:31   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in mempolicy_sysfs_init() Rakie Kim
2025-03-13 15:52     ` Gregory Price
2025-03-14  7:44       ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-14 10:55       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-14 13:42         ` Gregory Price
2025-03-17  8:24           ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-17  8:24         ` Rakie Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9Gs8i1FhJJ0eaiA@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox