linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, kernel_team@skhynix.com,
	honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm/mempolicy: Add memory hotplug support in weighted interleave
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:55:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8trXFxJVlYI9LAF@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8sXFGBYFlG2Z1s4@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:56:04AM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> 
> I think the underlying issue you're dealing with is that the system is
> creating more nodes for you than it should.
> 

Looking into this for other reasons, I think you are right that multiple
numa nodes can exist that cover the same memory - just different
regions.

I can see why you would want to hide the nodes that don't actively have
memory online, but i still have concerns for nodes that may come and
go and hiding this configuration from the user until memory arrives.

An example would be a DCD device where a node could add or remove memory
at any time.  If you removed the last block of memory, the node would
disappear - but the block could come back at any time.  That seems
problematic, as you might want to manage that node while no memory is
present.

~Gregory


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-07  6:35 Rakie Kim
2025-03-07  6:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Support memory hotplug " Rakie Kim
2025-03-07  6:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/mempolicy: Enable sysfs support for " Rakie Kim
2025-03-07 18:19   ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-10  8:28     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-07  6:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix duplicate node addition in sysfs for " Rakie Kim
2025-03-07  6:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in mempolicy_sysfs_init() Rakie Kim
2025-03-07 15:23   ` Gregory Price
2025-03-10  8:23     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-07 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm/mempolicy: Add memory hotplug support in weighted interleave Gregory Price
2025-03-07 21:55   ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-03-10  9:03     ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-10 14:13       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-12  8:18         ` Rakie Kim
2025-03-10  9:03   ` Rakie Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8trXFxJVlYI9LAF@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox