linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Cc: kernel_team@skhynix.com, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	harry.yoo@oracle.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rakie.kim@sk.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	dave.jiang@intel.com, horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 12:51:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8syE7l5H35pk9T5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c0d8aa8-cac7-4679-aece-af88e8129345@sk.com>

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:46:46PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> You can see more info below.
> 
>   $ cd /sys/devices/system/node
> 
>   $ ls -d node*
>   node0  node1  node2  node3
> 
>   $ cat possible
>   0-11

We're split across two threads now, but i'll add this context

I'm basically asking whether there should be 12 nodes possible. It seems
like there should only be 4 nodes possible - 2 for sockets, 2 for host
bridges.

Unless I'm misunderstanding, it should be the case that a given physical
address can only be hosted by 1 numa node (proximity domain).

So it *should* be the case that you either have 4 nodes possible or 10
nodes possible, not 12.  But I could be missing a piece of context.

> Which command do we need for this info specifically?  My output doesn't
> provide some useful info for that.
> 
>   $ acpidump -b
>   $ iasl -d *
>   $ cat cedt.dsl
>       ...
>   **** Unknown ACPI table signature [CEDT]
>

You probably have an old version of acpidump here, you might need to get
a newer version that knows about the CEDT.

You'll also want to get all the Memory Affinity entries from srat.dsl

> Not sure about it.  This must be fixed ASAP because current kernel is
> broken on this issue and the fix should go into hotfix tree first.
>

I agree something is broken, I'm not convinced what is broken.

> If you can think this is just a bandaid, but leaving it bleeding as is
> not the right approach.
>

This affects userland, we shouldn't thrash on this. Lets get it right.

~Gregory


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250228001631.1102-1-yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
2025-02-26 21:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning Joshua Hahn
2025-02-26 21:35   ` [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes Joshua Hahn
2025-02-27  2:32     ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-27  3:20       ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-03 21:56         ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 12:53           ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-03 16:19       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-04 13:03         ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-04 16:16           ` Gregory Price
2025-03-04 16:29       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-06 12:39         ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-06 17:32           ` Gregory Price
2025-03-07 11:46             ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-07 17:51               ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-03-10 12:26                 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-10 14:22                   ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11  2:07                     ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11  2:42                       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11  4:02                         ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11  4:42                           ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11  9:51                             ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11 15:52                               ` Gregory Price
2025-03-18  8:02                             ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-18 11:02                               ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-18 15:13                                 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-19  9:56                                   ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-19 14:54                                     ` Gregory Price
2025-02-28  0:16   ` [PATCH 1/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning yunjeong.mun
2025-02-28  6:39   ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-02-28 16:24     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 21:56     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 22:22       ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-05  9:49         ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-05 16:28           ` Joshua Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8syE7l5H35pk9T5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox