From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Cc: kernel_team@skhynix.com, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rakie.kim@sk.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 12:51:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8syE7l5H35pk9T5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c0d8aa8-cac7-4679-aece-af88e8129345@sk.com>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:46:46PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> You can see more info below.
>
> $ cd /sys/devices/system/node
>
> $ ls -d node*
> node0 node1 node2 node3
>
> $ cat possible
> 0-11
We're split across two threads now, but i'll add this context
I'm basically asking whether there should be 12 nodes possible. It seems
like there should only be 4 nodes possible - 2 for sockets, 2 for host
bridges.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, it should be the case that a given physical
address can only be hosted by 1 numa node (proximity domain).
So it *should* be the case that you either have 4 nodes possible or 10
nodes possible, not 12. But I could be missing a piece of context.
> Which command do we need for this info specifically? My output doesn't
> provide some useful info for that.
>
> $ acpidump -b
> $ iasl -d *
> $ cat cedt.dsl
> ...
> **** Unknown ACPI table signature [CEDT]
>
You probably have an old version of acpidump here, you might need to get
a newer version that knows about the CEDT.
You'll also want to get all the Memory Affinity entries from srat.dsl
> Not sure about it. This must be fixed ASAP because current kernel is
> broken on this issue and the fix should go into hotfix tree first.
>
I agree something is broken, I'm not convinced what is broken.
> If you can think this is just a bandaid, but leaving it bleeding as is
> not the right approach.
>
This affects userland, we shouldn't thrash on this. Lets get it right.
~Gregory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250228001631.1102-1-yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
2025-02-26 21:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning Joshua Hahn
2025-02-26 21:35 ` [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes Joshua Hahn
2025-02-27 2:32 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-27 3:20 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-03 21:56 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 12:53 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-03 16:19 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-04 13:03 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-04 16:16 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-04 16:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-06 12:39 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-06 17:32 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-07 11:46 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-07 17:51 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-03-10 12:26 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-10 14:22 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11 2:07 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11 2:42 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11 4:02 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11 4:42 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11 9:51 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11 15:52 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-18 8:02 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-18 11:02 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-18 15:13 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-19 9:56 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-19 14:54 ` Gregory Price
2025-02-28 0:16 ` [PATCH 1/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning yunjeong.mun
2025-02-28 6:39 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-02-28 16:24 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 21:56 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 22:22 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-05 9:49 ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-05 16:28 ` Joshua Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8syE7l5H35pk9T5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox