From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3962C021B8 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 036B56B0085; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:08:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F289B6B0088; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:08:37 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E17E26B0089; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:08:37 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C508A6B0085 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:08:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A676806A9 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83185107474.07.05050F8 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788E940007 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=UTsxy9+U; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1741122516; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=3cll4HEGgBga+xhcxslXnif10dGHllwX0pwA/5D+hoU=; b=uYa+i8/Dfua6Kxy5ePW0IKnfUa/IdKaxkLgThSvdNlG71/5A7k58ptsq+cQDY+D4MUs3z/ vbuXpOC4lXgotI+gWwh606s8vXE/09vGlUaaQEIN5dYRNiRZX4c/wRmMdrmk/DN2PHzSYj Va3qmfqrD2PjwjSAHLsDU1elqfTsDhk= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1741122516; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TUrxfMD8VLxoT1RRrobWwKIgDfZVUR+GKkQvTgmrkXZxDCeMqYMPSQdlizvVJeqTxkAa9T 90UoiPa0a3ZBqExtbqnjAXa1c4PsRJvZ76FB/0bP46SBQozvvCi6nUgU8P8Zi+yxfJ4fYY i2ZdSaQjbwf64lRYT8YhXCYGSeJRZ7o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=UTsxy9+U; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=3cll4HEGgBga+xhcxslXnif10dGHllwX0pwA/5D+hoU=; b=UTsxy9+UvODNWELurRpUkghxZS qIYkMPjzyivCL3DeQHfHkGDeG6e2jRGFzaY68aZwMtgDVWaP1SXbMlowHPhjEysPdAqw+sCe0baaq WaXfk5/zl7NxHCOQt+t9KZv3gqbVtwjbpeSE7ubvO/q9z/QM/m9VtfulWdC+ZQ70s9sd9pD78bdRe LE8dm8KKVjZrkTkYFzFvYkJVT1zmjYkB2wWGap+KpzcoDaOMW785lQqDhVc/xd1RuF/qNILgDe0IP jtDV2iXxNlPEqLB7oHeXmoWg/oMaHjm+jC5Gz4RDuwoC2tU2IIu5Rt+49CH2HYYuZv5UFSIiFFLcu oKSgFlWA==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpZV8-0000000475Y-25em; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:08:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:08:30 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel_th: avoid using deprecated page->mapping, index fields Message-ID: References: <20241203080001.12341-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> <0fcfc239-19c7-404f-bbc5-70a29ccf6ec0@lucifer.local> <87v7tyyrvb.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com> <64514bd2-0271-4b2e-b1f5-a35520fae4ff@lucifer.local> <87sep1zw6d.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sep1zw6d.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com> X-Stat-Signature: nuf9poxbdotq7agjqyxwoq15r9phkqbu X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 788E940007 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1741122514-950439 X-HE-Meta: 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 ZkrrDBSZ slr0gsnUzkKukcWABT2jAzv1+Iyh/tdwhiy8vNvgDgcw0qnt9DfB941tSb94eea8/gIH+9Lsr/cJlwBSpRwmaEjyZmuF4RXxhUAqhNhEh2UEI9Ts2ki97onh88vpxJHsdOWeFmOJRS34g0YuynNL6Td0VeiLWJF0qjEEhfPW8JSXiAdKm5DjbGPmcBqwXr130PhB5o//LnmOy4hpr0/On5u8YDDSq3v5tCt6n6XewfP/WET8Z1G9KHKLzgd0FmHRtfarznV0zC+DSzwCv6kQc0xxa05yRTCMge8WEUv6f4yygp3hsBTGDVFRCUwUldDnhceSQ X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000006, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:06PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Lorenzo Stoakes writes: > > > Thanks very much! Yeah just keen to get this in as we are moving towards > > removing these fields very soon. > > My understanding is that this is a part of larger effort to reduce > struct page to 8 bytes and an optionally dynamically allocated slightly > larger structure, is that correct? Just curious. > > > Could you take this in your tree? I think that'd work best. > > Sure, will do. Hi, this doesn't appear to be in linux-next yet. Could you confirm it's scheduled to hit the next merge window?