linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: update nr_huge_pages and surplus_huge_pages together
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:17:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8bFRDMf_Y4aG7uD@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304083841.283159-1-liushixin2@huawei.com>

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:38:41PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> In alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio(), we increase nr_huge_pages and
> surplus_huge_pages separately. In the middle window, if we set
> nr_hugepages to smaller and satisfy count < persistent_huge_pages(h),
> the surplus_huge_pages will be increased by adjust_pool_surplus().
> 
> After adding delay in the middle window, we can reproduce the problem
> easily by following step:
> 
>  1. echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages
>  2. mmap two hugepages. When nr_huge_pages=2 and surplus_huge_pages=1,
>     goto step 3.
>  3. echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_huge_pages
> 
> Finally, nr_huge_pages is less than surplus_huge_pages.
> 
> To fix the problem, call only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio() instead and
> move down __prep_account_new_huge_page() into the hugetlb_lock.
> 
> Fixes: 0c397daea1d4 ("mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API")
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 9faa1034704ff..0b02ea1c39e63 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2253,11 +2253,19 @@ static struct folio *alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>  
> -	folio = alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> +	folio = only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask, NULL);
>  	if (!folio)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folio(h, folio);
> +
>  	spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * Update nr_huge_pages and surplus_huge_pages together,
> +	 * otherwise it might confuse persistent_huge_pages() momentarily.
> +	 */
> +	__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, nid);

It would be great if we could pair up this one with the actual increase
of surplus pages, but then free_huge_folio() will decrease the
nr_huge_pages if the pool changed.

Also, that comment makes me think that__prep_account_new_huge_page()
will adjust both counters, so maybe just go with something like

"nr_huge_pages needs to be adjusted within the same lock cycle
as surplus_pages, otherwise..."


-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs


      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04  8:38 Liu Shixin
2025-03-04  9:17 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8bFRDMf_Y4aG7uD@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox