Re: [PATCH] slub: Fix Off-By-One in the While condition in on_freelist()

[Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>]

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:57:01PM +0200, Lilitha Persefoni Gkini wrote:
> The condition `nr <= slab->objects` in the `on_freelist()` serves as
> bound while walking through the `freelist` linked list because we can't
> have more free objects than the maximum amount of objects in the slab.
> But the `=` can result in an extra unnecessary iteration.
> 
> The patch changes it to `nr < slab->objects` to ensure it iterates
> at most `slab->objects` number of times.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lilitha Persefoni Gkini <lilithpgkini@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 1f50129dcfb3..ad42450d4b0f 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1435,7 +1435,7 @@ static int on_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void *search)
>  	int max_objects;
>  
>  	fp = slab->freelist;
> -	while (fp && nr <= slab->objects) {
> +	while (fp && nr < slab->objects) {

Hi, this makes sense to me.

But based on what the name of the variable suggests (nr of objects),
I think it makes clearer to initialize it to 1 instead?

--
Cheers,
Harry