From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zswap: do not crash the kernel on decompression failure
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:12:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z76Go1VGw272joly@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225213200.729056-1-nphamcs@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:32:00PM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
> Currently, we crash the kernel when a decompression failure occurs in
> zswap (either because of memory corruption, or a bug in the compression
> algorithm). This is overkill. We should only SIGBUS the unfortunate
> process asking for the zswap entry on zswap load, and skip the corrupted
> entry in zswap writeback.
Some relevant observations/questions, but not really actionable for this
patch, perhaps some future work, or more likely some incoherent
illogical thoughts :
(1) It seems like not making the folio uptodate will cause shmem faults
to mark the swap entry as hwpoisoned, but I don't see similar handling
for do_swap_page(). So it seems like even if we SIGBUS the process,
other processes mapping the same page could follow in the same
footsteps.
(2) A hwpoisoned swap entry results in VM_FAULT_SIGBUS in some cases
(e.g. shmem_fault() -> shmem_get_folio_gfp() -> shmem_swapin_folio()),
even though we have VM_FAULT_HWPOISON. This patch falls under this
bucket, but unfortunately we cannot tell for sure if it's a hwpoision or
a decompression bug.
(3) If we run into a decompression failure, should we free the
underlying memory from zsmalloc? I don't know. On one hand if we free it
zsmalloc may start using it for more compressed objects. OTOH, I don't
think proper hwpoison handling will kick in until the page is freed.
Maybe we should tell zsmalloc to drop this page entirely and mark
objects within it as invalid? Probably not worth the hassle but
something to think about.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 21:32 Nhat Pham
2025-02-25 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-25 22:28 ` Nhat Pham
2025-02-26 0:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-02-26 2:45 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-26 3:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-02-26 15:42 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-26 23:39 ` Nhat Pham
2025-02-26 2:40 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-26 23:16 ` Nhat Pham
2025-02-27 0:03 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-26 3:12 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2025-02-26 4:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-02-26 15:33 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-26 23:20 ` Nhat Pham
2025-02-27 0:00 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-26 23:29 ` Nhat Pham
2025-02-26 23:58 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z76Go1VGw272joly@google.com \
--to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox