Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_alloc: don't steal single pages from biggest buddy

[Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:35:25PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> -	return NULL;
> >> +	if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT)
> >> +		return NULL;
> > 
> > Is this a separate change? Is it a bug that we currently allow
> > stealing a from a fallback type when ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT? (I wonder if
> > the second loop was supposed to start from min_order).
> 
> It's subtle but not a new condition. Previously ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT would
> result in not taking the "goto find_smallest" path because it means
> searching >=pageblock_order only and that would always be can_steal == true
> if it found a fallback. And failure to find fallback would reach an
> unconditional return NULL here. Now we fall through the search below
> (instead of the goto), but ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT must not do it so it's now
> explicit here.

Ahhhh yes, thank you for the help. The new explicit code is much
better.

Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>