From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
chenfeiyang@loongson.cn, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: mm: Populate vmemmap/linear at the page level for hotplugged sections
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:32:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3_d59kp4CuHQp97@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515dae4-cb53-4645-8c72-d33b27ede7eb@quicinc.com>
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 03:04:22PM +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote:
> On 2025/1/8 18:52, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > I found another bug, that even for early section, when
> > > vmemmap_populate is called, SECTION_IS_EARLY is not set.
> > > Therefore, early_section() always return false.
[...]
> > > Since vmemmap_populate() occurs during section initialization, it
> > > may be hard to say it is a bug.. However, should we instead using
> > > SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT to check? I tested well in my setup.
> > >
> > > Hot plug flow:
> > > 1. section_activate -> vmemmap_populate
> > > 2. mark PRESENT
> > >
> > > In contrast, the early flow:
> > > 1. memblocks_present -> mark PRESENT
> > > 2. __populate_section_memmap -> vmemmap_populate
> >
> > But from a semantics perspective, should SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT be marked on a
> > section before SECTION_IS_EARLY ? Is it really the expected behaviour here or
> > that needs to be fixed first ?
>
> The tricky part is vmemmap_populate initializes mem_map, that happens during
> mem_section initialization process. PRESENT or EARLY tag is in the same
> process as well. There doesn't appear to be a compelling reason to enforce a
> specific sequence..
The order in which a section is marked as present and vmemmap created
does seem a bit arbitrary. At least the early code seems to rely on the
for_each_present_section_nr() loop, so we'll always have this first but
it's not some internal kernel API that guarantees this.
> > Although SYSTEM_BOOTING state check might help but section flag seems to be the
> > right thing to do here.
>
> Good idea, I prefer to vote for this alternative rather than PRESENT tag. As
> I see we already took this stage to determine whether memmap pages are boot
> pages or not in common mm code:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13-rc3/source/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c#L465
The advantage of SYSTEM_BOOTING is that we don't need to rely on the
section information at all, though we could add a WARN_ON_ONCE if the
section is not present.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 7:42 Zhenhua Huang
2025-01-07 19:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-01-08 10:07 ` Zhenhua Huang
2025-01-08 10:52 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-01-09 7:04 ` Zhenhua Huang
2025-01-09 14:32 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-01-10 3:13 ` Zhenhua Huang
2025-01-08 10:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-01-09 7:04 ` Zhenhua Huang
2025-01-09 12:10 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z3_d59kp4CuHQp97@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=chenfeiyang@loongson.cn \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox