From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] mm, swap: minor clean up for swap entry allocation
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:04:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z39K4cGuXbQs9Pwu@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241230174621.61185-2-ryncsn@gmail.com>
On 12/31/24 at 01:46am, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Direct reclaim can skip the whole folio after reclaimed a set of
> folio based slots. Also simplify the code for allocation, reduce
> indention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
This actually can be split as two patches. Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index b0a9071cfe1d..f8002f110104 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -604,23 +604,28 @@ static bool cluster_reclaim_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> unsigned char *map = si->swap_map;
> - unsigned long offset;
> + unsigned long offset = start;
> + int nr_reclaim;
>
> spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> spin_unlock(&si->lock);
>
> - for (offset = start; offset < end; offset++) {
> + do {
> switch (READ_ONCE(map[offset])) {
> case 0:
> - continue;
> + offset++;
> + break;
> case SWAP_HAS_CACHE:
> - if (__try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT) > 0)
> - continue;
> - goto out;
> + nr_reclaim = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT);
> + if (nr_reclaim > 0)
> + offset += nr_reclaim;
> + else
> + goto out;
> + break;
> default:
> goto out;
> }
> - }
> + } while (offset < end);
> out:
> spin_lock(&si->lock);
> spin_lock(&ci->lock);
> @@ -838,35 +843,30 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> &found, order, usage);
> frags++;
> if (found)
> - break;
> + goto done;
> }
>
> - if (!found) {
> + /*
> + * Nonfull clusters are moved to frag tail if we reached
> + * here, count them too, don't over scan the frag list.
> + */
> + while (frags < si->frag_cluster_nr[order]) {
> + ci = list_first_entry(&si->frag_clusters[order],
> + struct swap_cluster_info, list);
> /*
> - * Nonfull clusters are moved to frag tail if we reached
> - * here, count them too, don't over scan the frag list.
> + * Rotate the frag list to iterate, they were all failing
> + * high order allocation or moved here due to per-CPU usage,
> + * this help keeping usable cluster ahead.
> */
> - while (frags < si->frag_cluster_nr[order]) {
> - ci = list_first_entry(&si->frag_clusters[order],
> - struct swap_cluster_info, list);
> - /*
> - * Rotate the frag list to iterate, they were all failing
> - * high order allocation or moved here due to per-CPU usage,
> - * this help keeping usable cluster ahead.
> - */
> - list_move_tail(&ci->list, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
> - offset = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - &found, order, usage);
> - frags++;
> - if (found)
> - break;
> - }
> + list_move_tail(&ci->list, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
> + offset = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> + &found, order, usage);
> + frags++;
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
> }
>
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> -
> if (!list_empty(&si->discard_clusters)) {
> /*
> * we don't have free cluster but have some clusters in
> @@ -904,7 +904,6 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> goto done;
> }
> }
> -
> done:
> cluster->next[order] = offset;
> return found;
> --
> 2.47.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-30 17:46 [PATCH v3 00/13] mm, swap: rework of swap allocator locks Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] mm, swap: minor clean up for swap entry allocation Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:04 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] mm, swap: fold swap_info_get_cont in the only caller Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:05 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] mm, swap: remove old allocation path for HDD Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:06 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] mm, swap: use cluster lock " Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:07 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mm, swap: clean up device availability check Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:08 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mm, swap: clean up plist removal and adding Kairui Song
2025-01-02 8:59 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-03 8:07 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mm, swap: hold a reference during scan and cleanup flag usage Kairui Song
2025-01-04 5:46 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-13 5:34 ` Kairui Song
2025-01-20 2:39 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-27 9:19 ` Kairui Song
2025-02-05 9:18 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] mm, swap: use an enum to define all cluster flags and wrap flags changes Kairui Song
2025-01-06 8:43 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-13 5:49 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] mm, swap: reduce contention on device lock Kairui Song
2025-01-06 10:12 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-08 11:09 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-09 2:15 ` Kairui Song
2025-01-10 11:23 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-13 6:33 ` Kairui Song
2025-01-13 8:07 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] mm, swap: simplify percpu cluster updating Kairui Song
2025-01-09 2:07 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] mm, swap: introduce a helper for retrieving cluster from offset Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mm, swap: use a global swap cluster for non-rotation devices Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mm, swap_slots: remove slot cache for freeing path Kairui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z39K4cGuXbQs9Pwu@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox