linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: hare@suse.de, dave@stgolabs.net, david@fromorbit.com,
	djwong@kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
	hch@lst.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
	kernel@pankajraghav.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 20:05:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2MrCey3RIBJz9_E@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218022626.3668119-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:26:21PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> This splits up a minor enhancement from the bs > ps device support
> series into its own series for better review / focus / testing.
> This series just addresses the reducing the array size used and cleaning
> up the async read to be easier to read and maintain.

How about this approach instead -- get rid of the batch entirely?

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index cc8452f60251..f50ebbc1f518 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -2361,9 +2361,9 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
 	sector_t iblock, lblock;
-	struct buffer_head *bh, *head, *arr[MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE];
+	struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
 	size_t blocksize;
-	int nr, i;
+	int i, submitted = 0;
 	int fully_mapped = 1;
 	bool page_error = false;
 	loff_t limit = i_size_read(inode);
@@ -2380,7 +2380,6 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
 	iblock = div_u64(folio_pos(folio), blocksize);
 	lblock = div_u64(limit + blocksize - 1, blocksize);
 	bh = head;
-	nr = 0;
 	i = 0;
 
 	do {
@@ -2411,40 +2410,30 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
 			if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
 				continue;
 		}
-		arr[nr++] = bh;
+
+		lock_buffer(bh);
+		if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+			unlock_buffer(bh);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		mark_buffer_async_read(bh);
+		submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, bh);
+		submitted++;
 	} while (i++, iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
 
 	if (fully_mapped)
 		folio_set_mappedtodisk(folio);
 
-	if (!nr) {
-		/*
-		 * All buffers are uptodate or get_block() returned an
-		 * error when trying to map them - we can finish the read.
-		 */
-		folio_end_read(folio, !page_error);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	/* Stage two: lock the buffers */
-	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
-		bh = arr[i];
-		lock_buffer(bh);
-		mark_buffer_async_read(bh);
-	}
-
 	/*
-	 * Stage 3: start the IO.  Check for uptodateness
-	 * inside the buffer lock in case another process reading
-	 * the underlying blockdev brought it uptodate (the sct fix).
+	 * All buffers are uptodate or get_block() returned an error
+	 * when trying to map them - we must finish the read because
+	 * end_buffer_async_read() will never be called on any buffer
+	 * in this folio.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
-		bh = arr[i];
-		if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
-			end_buffer_async_read(bh, 1);
-		else
-			submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, bh);
-	}
+	if (!submitted)
+		folio_end_read(folio, !page_error);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(block_read_full_folio);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-18  2:26 Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18  2:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/buffer: move async batch read code into a helper Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18  2:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18  2:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 19:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-18  2:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs/buffer: add iteration support " Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18  2:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] fs/buffer: reduce stack usage on bh_read_iter() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18  2:47   ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-18 20:05 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-12-19  2:27   ` [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-19  3:51     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-30 17:30       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-01-31 16:54       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-01-31 22:01         ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-03 14:00           ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-19  6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-19 17:53   ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z2MrCey3RIBJz9_E@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox