linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: hch@lst.de, hare@suse.de, dave@stgolabs.net, david@fromorbit.com,
	djwong@kernel.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
	kernel@pankajraghav.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/11] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio()
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:05:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2CIIArEF_NekLxs@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z2B36lejOx434hAR@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:56:44AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 04:02:53AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:10:40PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > -	do {
> > > +	for_each_bh(bh, head) {
> > >  		if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
> > >  			continue;
> > >  
> > > @@ -2454,7 +2464,9 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
> > >  				continue;
> > >  		}
> > >  		arr[nr++] = bh;
> > > -	} while (i++, iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
> > > +		i++;
> > > +		iblock++;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > This is non-equivalent.  That 'continue' you can see would increment i
> > and iblock.  Now it doesn't.
> 
> Thanks, not sure how I missed that! With that fix in place I ran a full
> baseline against ext4 and all XFS profiles.
> 
> For ext4 the new failures I see are just:
> 
>   * generic/044
>   * generic/045
>   * generic/046

Oh my, these all fail on vanilla v6.12-rc2 so its not the code which is
at fault.

 Luis


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-16 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-14  3:10 [RFC v2 00/11] enable bs > ps for block devices Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 01/11] fs/buffer: move async batch read code into a helper Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17  9:56   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 02/11] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14  4:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-16 18:56     ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-16 20:05       ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2024-12-16 21:46         ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17  8:46       ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17  9:57   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 03/11] fs/buffer: add iteration support " Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 10:00   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 04/11] fs/buffer: reduce stack usage on bh_read_iter() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 10:04   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 05/11] fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14  4:46   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 06/11] fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 07/11] fs/buffer fs/mpage: remove large folio restriction Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 08/11] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 09/11] block/bdev: lift block size restrictions and use common definition Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-16  8:55   ` John Garry
2024-12-16  9:19     ` Ming Lei
2024-12-16 10:13       ` John Garry
2024-12-16 10:23         ` Ming Lei
2024-12-17 20:51     ` John Garry
2024-12-17 10:05   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-17 21:00   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 10/11] nvme: remove superfluous block size check Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-15  0:39   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-14  3:10 ` [RFC v2 11/11] bdev: use bdev_io_min() for statx block size Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z2CIIArEF_NekLxs@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox