From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
hakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: allow exiting tasks to write back data to swap
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:31:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1ssHQYI-Wyc1adP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212115754.38f798b3@fangorn>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 11:57:54AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> A task already in exit can get stuck trying to allocate pages, if its
> cgroup is at the memory.max limit, the cgroup is using zswap, but
> zswap writeback is enabled, and the remaining memory in the cgroup is
> not compressible.
Is it about a single task or groups of tasks or the entire cgroup?
If former, why it's a problem? A tight memcg limit can slow things down
in general and I don't see why we should treat the exit() path differently.
If it's about the entire cgroup and we have essentially a deadlock,
I feel like we need to look into the oom reaper side.
Alternatively we can allow to go over the limit in this case, but only
assuming all tasks in the cgroup are going to die and no new task can
enter it.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 16:57 Rik van Riel
2024-12-12 17:06 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-12 17:51 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-12 18:02 ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-12 18:18 ` Nhat Pham
2024-12-12 18:11 ` Nhat Pham
2024-12-12 18:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-12-12 21:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-12 21:41 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-12-13 0:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-12-13 4:42 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-12-16 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 16:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-01-14 16:46 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 16:51 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 17:00 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 18:13 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 19:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-01-14 19:42 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-15 17:35 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-15 19:41 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 16:54 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 16:56 ` Rik van Riel
2025-01-14 16:56 ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-12 18:31 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2024-12-12 20:00 ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-13 0:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-12-13 2:54 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1ssHQYI-Wyc1adP@google.com \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox