From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmalloc: Account memcg per vmalloc
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:50:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1nC3138biX0J1DJ@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241211160956.GB3136251@cmpxchg.org>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:09:56AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> This would work, but it seems somewhat complicated. The atomics in
> memcg charging and the vmstat updates are batched, and the per-page
> overhead is for the most part cheap per-cpu ops. Not an issue per se.
OK, fair enough, I hadn't realised it was a percpu-refcount. Still,
we might consume several batches (batch size of 64) when we could do it
all in one shot.
Perhaps you'd be more persuaded by:
(a) If we clear __GFP_ACCOUNT then alloc_pages_bulk() will work, and
that's a pretty significant performance win over calling alloc_pages()
in a loop.
(b) Once we get to memdescs, calling alloc_pages() with __GFP_ACCOUNT
set is going to require allocating a memdesc to store the obj_cgroup
in, so in the future we'll save an allocation.
Your proposed alternative will work and is way less churn. But it's
not preparing us for memdescs ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-11 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-11 4:32 [PATCH 1/2] vmalloc: Fix accounting of VmallocUsed with i915 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-12-11 4:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] vmalloc: Account memcg per vmalloc Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-12-11 5:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-11 16:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-12-11 16:50 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-12-11 19:32 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-11 20:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-11 20:58 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-11 21:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-11 22:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-11 23:36 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-11 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] vmalloc: Fix accounting of VmallocUsed with i915 Johannes Weiner
2024-12-11 20:45 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1nC3138biX0J1DJ@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox