linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in binder_vma_close() at mmap_assert_locked() in stable v5.15
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:39:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzWuL4H+jf6Yzu7i@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpHS-eZFHvauzdoke_BLMs3em2=ag6qvHPs_rz8=-rTUBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:21:27PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > However, I wonder why isn't ->mmap() being undone for this exit path in
> > mmap_region()? If anything fails _after_ call_mmap() it seems we
> > silently unmap and free the vma. What about allocations, atomic_incs,
> > and anything done inside ->mmap()?
> 
> I think if ->mmap() fails it is expected to undo its own changes
> before returning the error. mmap_region() has no idea what kind of
> changes ->mmap() has done before it failed, therefore it can't undo
> them. At least that's how I understand it.

I agree ->mmap() should undo its own changes if it fails. However, the
scenario I'm referring to is an error _after_ ->mmap() call succeeds.
In this case it can be the arch_validate_flags() check. On error, the
vma is torn down and the drivers are never informed about it.

> > Shouldn't a ->close() be needed here
> > to undo these things as such:
> > --
> > @@ -1872,6 +1889,9 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> >
> >         return addr;
> >
> > +undo_mmap:
> > +       if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->close)
> > +               vma->vm_ops->close(vma);
> >  unmap_and_free_vma:
> >         fput(vma->vm_file);
> >         vma->vm_file = NULL;
> > --
> >
> 
> I don't see mmap_region() calling vma->vm_ops->open() anywhere. So why
> would it have to call vma->vm_ops->close()?

My understanding is ->mmap() is called on the very first mapping and
vm_ops->close() is subsequently called whenever a mapping is removed.
So IIUC a vm_ops->open() is not required in this exchange.

There are multiple places where I can see rely on this behavior. Just to
provide an example, look at coda_file_mmap() which allocates cvm_ops and
increments references on ->mmap(). It then expects coda_vm_close() to be
called when the vma is removed to decrement these references and lastly
free cvm_ops. However, if mmap_region() fails after ->mmap() call then
vm_ops->close() is never invoked and the reference count in coda is now
off making cvm_ops leaked memory.

Other type of issues happen depending on the ->mmap() implementation. In
our case it was a BUG_ON() in binder.

I don't know if adding vm_ops->close() to the exit error path is an
appropriate solution. Perhaps ->mmap() should be a point of no return
instead and vm_flags should be validated earlier? I would be concerned
about drivers modifying the vm_flags during ->mmap() though. I'll send
out a patch to get more feedback on this vm_ops->close().

--
Carlos Llamas


      reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08 20:28 Carlos Llamas
2022-09-08 22:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 19:35   ` Carlos Llamas
2022-09-09 20:03     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-12 19:11       ` Carlos Llamas
2022-09-13  6:36         ` Liam Howlett
2022-09-23 20:50           ` Carlos Llamas
2022-09-28 23:21             ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-29 14:39               ` Carlos Llamas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YzWuL4H+jf6Yzu7i@google.com \
    --to=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox