From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: amusing SLUB compaction bug when CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:09:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzRjR8r/dzU17Sw2@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzRQvoVsnJzsauwb@google.com>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:48:46PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 02:49:02PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > It's a bug in linux-next, but taking me too long to identify which
> > > commit is "to blame", so let me throw it over to you without more
> > > delay: I think __PageMovable() now needs to check !PageSlab().
> > >
> > > I had made a small experimental change somewhere, rebuilt and rebooted,
> > > was not surprised to crash once swapping and compaction came in,
> > > but was surprised to find the crash in isolate_movable_page(),
> > > called by compaction's isolate_migratepages_block().
> > >
> > > page->mapping was ffffffff811303aa, which qualifies as __PageMovable(),
> > > which expects struct movable_operations at page->mapping minus low bits.
> > > But ffffffff811303aa was the address of SLUB's rcu_free_slab(): I have
> > > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y, so function addresses may have low bits set.
> > >
> > > Over to you! Thanks,
> > > Hugh
> >
> > Wow, didn't expect this.
> > Thank you for report!
> >
> > That should be due to commit 65505d1f2338e7
> > ("mm/sl[au]b: rearrange struct slab fields to allow larger rcu_head")
> > as now rcu_head can use some bits that shares with mapping.
> >
> > Hmm IMO we have two choices...
> >
> > 1. simply drop the commit as it's only for debugging (RCU folks may not like [1])
>
> Yeah definitely don't like this option as patches are out that depend on
> this (not yet merged though). :-)
Yeah, better to avoid that.
> > 2. make __PageMovable() to use true page flag, with approach [2])
>
> What are the drawbacks of making it a true flag?
We don't have free bit in page flags unless we free one ;)
> thanks,
>
> - Joel
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/85afd876-d8bb-0804-b2c5-48ed3055e702@joelfernandes.org/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220919125708.276864-1-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com/
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 5:16 Hugh Dickins
2022-09-28 5:49 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-28 13:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-28 15:09 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2022-09-28 16:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-28 17:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-29 9:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-29 21:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-30 7:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-30 10:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-30 11:02 ` David Laight
2022-09-30 16:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-30 21:34 ` David Laight
2022-10-02 5:48 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-03 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-04 14:26 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-04 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-05 11:07 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-24 14:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-24 15:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-24 15:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-24 16:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-25 4:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-10-25 9:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-25 15:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-10-25 13:47 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-25 14:08 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-26 10:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-26 12:29 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-04 15:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-29 11:53 ` David Laight
2022-09-29 13:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-29 14:04 ` David Laight
2022-09-28 17:56 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-28 19:53 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzRjR8r/dzU17Sw2@hyeyoo \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox