From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F28C433FE for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 86FCA6B0071; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 81F576B0073; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:35:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6994D6B0074; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:35:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9CB6B0071 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66A941042 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:35:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79988050464.05.76FAA13 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D0114001A for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1665002111; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Spyd4QK8zfzxDBXuoxBL/PDaUjw/dZKhbr0mZm9nT1c=; b=J2AkCIOEgNto0KicFy4SuVv5o/Kd6AqLuXUdnuUcOgMPNcMv0vJZ0qeJLi4RxcZQT04SDu 5zE4jRMITT2bz8TtXrJ6qFqpIcBoVTqjA8EF6Gt/XMySnbqX9PbXn4/q9En9nfqmFN2jJQ u0k0qp7pdzlJL6meP0ybIJOf6Snfys0= Received: from mail-qk1-f199.google.com (mail-qk1-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-398-KRKWabupOP2gf0gFasCSjQ-1; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:35:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: KRKWabupOP2gf0gFasCSjQ-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id bi3-20020a05620a318300b006cf2d389cdaso14985855qkb.8 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:35:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Spyd4QK8zfzxDBXuoxBL/PDaUjw/dZKhbr0mZm9nT1c=; b=sk1maCNmNaCprQudu2MHEZkiCHE6AEHkwbZH1+sxKfUNEY3SE+mmpOYvmg+8ipbesg LNid/4TeuopqVrKb2RUZrQ/2ABbi7u0NCyKVFJTrKjOED+6PMWnIgg7amzp4+iG8OxnM 8DymFIXGNq9EXcdrFLzz0e1ZFWrqPdVP/YJW7nyspjnUZVRFbWZ9UcHNnrKeFNsq3BtU mLVm1XBgzXHKK6DT4Bk8DnTVrzSaLoZ8Q+dfNwQqfkdfDPLsT9jJuAUT1w7y11NI++eK bnqDiGNjAsM9Sj0Tjmjuc94/efJvc2d5YBneYqWe+L39I6w7uPUjw1AWfHGeT/p0vEsK coHw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0FEGJ7e+oJStArDuTxpnFv+GxNeRqh8vgPZTSIvWfg9IZ/IBSv KYom+vBdzVzNbxcPksh1r59m4o/n05I9EjfJkPx0iAdt3FlcT1r+XsD/ne4WL1zsxZIVaOf0WRy Hg5gTXTOuU+A= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e70a:0:b0:6ce:bfc0:f98b with SMTP id m10-20020ae9e70a000000b006cebfc0f98bmr935027qka.381.1665002108326; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:35:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4XAXGxI08IXKU2+P8nxYIGcJ4Cjc/Q8ZELN25KxB1W3P8p9sLvCKgIKsx7ZggEAFUf6g9lCw== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e70a:0:b0:6ce:bfc0:f98b with SMTP id m10-20020ae9e70a000000b006cebfc0f98bmr935012qka.381.1665002108085; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1n (bras-base-aurron9127w-grc-46-70-31-27-79.dsl.bell.ca. [70.31.27.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8-20020a05620a400800b006bb9e4b96e6sm18233280qko.24.2022.10.05.13.35.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:35:06 -0400 From: Peter Xu To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , Hugh Dickins , Vlastimil Babka , Andrea Arcangeli , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] mm/ksm: fix KSM COW breaking with userfaultfd-wp via FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE Message-ID: References: <20220930141931.174362-1-david@redhat.com> <20220930141931.174362-5-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220930141931.174362-5-david@redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1665002112; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Spyd4QK8zfzxDBXuoxBL/PDaUjw/dZKhbr0mZm9nT1c=; b=Dwk4WPMPmLlpW2te9q6UQfVJozhXDbR5KP2xm8XKkQ/SY/yV/Vanlkpst79Adb9jcvTGIb nXTPR1YHMgtaDOrNiNa8NrlXW7+PbEQifBNdC/vuTkySYpkr5MtSs+9Sl5TOP2GaYC5s+P htxvtoIXqwz3sCUcyQpILSq3P+fKiGY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=J2AkCIOE; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of peterx@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1665002112; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=onYxpdFrHZMEDfC6D+Zy1gRvUe4c/07vSO/kUFuk0W/lqdn5vZNxdZnnGYtPiQHIo3EtRU /YcOQkZjPSx2ZzmF3NJTtIts3+saSQM3UT91a4STHCMiUtGFsJWJMtChJeegEceTVXOkCl wKNs1iJAxUkDzrmiXyjYpmj9tujN5QQ= Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=J2AkCIOE; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of peterx@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 75D0114001A X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: i8jharfi336nn5k49rq6u4ab8rskzwt9 X-HE-Tag: 1665002112-576449 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:19:28PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Let's stop breaking COW via a fake write fault and let's use > FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE instead. This avoids any wrong side effects of the fake > write fault, such as mapping the PTE writable and marking the pte > dirty/softdirty. > > Also, this fixes KSM interaction with userfaultfd-wp: when we have a KSM > page that's write-protected by userfaultfd, break_ksm()->handle_mm_fault() > will fail with VM_FAULT_SIGBUS and will simpy return in break_ksm() with 0. > The warning in dmesg indicates this wrong handling: > > [ 230.096368] FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY missing 881 > [ 230.100822] CPU: 1 PID: 1643 Comm: ksm-uffd-wp [...] > [ 230.110124] Hardware name: [...] > [ 230.117775] Call Trace: > [ 230.120227] > [ 230.122334] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c > [ 230.126010] handle_userfault.cold+0x14/0x19 > [ 230.130281] ? tlb_finish_mmu+0x65/0x170 > [ 230.134207] ? uffd_wp_range+0x65/0xa0 > [ 230.137959] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30 > [ 230.141972] ? do_wp_page+0x50/0x590 > [ 230.145551] __handle_mm_fault+0x9f5/0xf50 > [ 230.149652] ? mmput+0x1f/0x40 > [ 230.152712] handle_mm_fault+0xb9/0x2a0 > [ 230.156550] break_ksm+0x141/0x180 > [ 230.159964] unmerge_ksm_pages+0x60/0x90 > [ 230.163890] ksm_madvise+0x3c/0xb0 > [ 230.167295] do_madvise.part.0+0x10c/0xeb0 > [ 230.171396] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 > [ 230.175157] __x64_sys_madvise+0x5a/0x70 > [ 230.179082] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 > [ 230.182661] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 > [ 230.186413] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Since it's already there, worth adding the test into ksm_test.c? > > Consequently, we will no longer trigger a fake write fault and break COW > without any such side-effects. > > This is primarily a fix for KSM+userfaultfd-wp, however, the fake write > fault was always questionable. As this fix is not easy to backport and it's > not very critical, let's not cc stable. A patch to cc most of the stable would probably need to still go with the old write approach but attaching ALLOW_RETRY. But I agree maybe that may not need to bother, or a report should have arrived earlier.. The unshare approach looks much cleaner indeed. > > Fixes: 529b930b87d9 ("userfaultfd: wp: hook userfault handler to write protection fault") > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Peter Xu -- Peter Xu