linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: call kasan_malloc() from __kmalloc_*track_caller()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:42:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyhVrepabvXPTKa6@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f06965ea-c7e5-3a8d-f819-64baedf75d96@suse.cz>

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/14/22 08:52, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the Cc.
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 07:00:01PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> >> We were failing to call kasan_malloc() from __kmalloc_*track_caller()
> >> which was causing us to sometimes fail to produce KASAN error reports
> >> for allocations made using e.g. devm_kcalloc(), as the KASAN poison was
> >> not being initialized. Fix it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.15
> >> ---
> >> The same problem is being fixed upstream in:
> 
> The "upstream" here is now only in -next, not mainline yet, so we still
> have more options at this point.
> 
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220817101826.236819-6-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com/
> >> as part of a larger patch series, but this more targeted fix seems
> >> more suitable for the stable kernel. Hyeonggon, maybe you can add
> >> this patch to the start of your series and it can be picked up
> >> by the stable maintainers.
> ...
> > 
> > Ah, I should have sent it to stable team ;)
> > 
> > I think "Option 3" in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst will be appropriate,
> > So will resend this after the series goes to Linus's tree.
> 
> I'll pick this for sending to Linus after rc6, which means the series in
> slab.git / -next will afterwards cause a trivial conflict to resolve
> when merging. AFAIK Linus prefers that over late rebasing.
> It will also make it simple for stable.

I think that is better option, thanks!

> 
> > Thank you Peter!
> > 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Hyeonggon


      reply	other threads:[~2022-09-19 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-14  2:00 Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-14  6:52 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-16 17:32   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-19 11:42     ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyhVrepabvXPTKa6@hyeyoo \
    --to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox