From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: david@redhat.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, jgg@nvidia.com, hughd@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: gup: fix the fast GUP race against THP collapse
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:33:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxJot6JbFl0HnXq3@xz-m1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbLzkqGdnwY4P8jKQR0ojm6QV6b3dBi5pwrC1UJ4dqi3EqS4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 10:45:20AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > How about another patch to remove the ppc impl too? Then it can be a two
> > patches series.
>
> BTW, I don't think we could remove the ppc implementation since it is
> different from the generic pmdp_collapse_flush(), particularly for the
> hash part IIUC.
>
> The generic version calls flush_tlb_range() -> hash__flush_tlb_range()
> for hash, but the hash call is actually no-op. The ppc version calls
> hash__pmdp_collapse_flush() -> flush_tlb_pmd_range(), which does
> something useful.
One thing I found interesting (and also a bit confused..) is that the ppc
code used the name flush_tlb_pmd_range() to "flush tlb range in pte level",
which is kind of against the tlb API design..
The generic tlb API has a very close function called flush_pmd_tlb_range()
which is only used to do pmd-level flushing, while here the ppc version of
flush_tlb_pmd_range() is actually flush_tlb_range() in the generic API.
Agreed that it may worth having a look from ppc developers.
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 22:27 Yang Shi
2022-09-01 23:26 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-01 23:50 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-02 6:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-02 15:23 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-02 15:59 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-02 16:04 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-02 17:30 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-02 17:45 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-02 20:33 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-09-05 8:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-09-05 8:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-09-06 19:07 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-07 4:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-09-07 17:08 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-04 22:21 ` John Hubbard
2022-09-02 6:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-04 22:29 ` John Hubbard
2022-09-05 7:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-05 10:16 ` Baolin Wang
2022-09-05 10:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-05 11:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-05 14:35 ` Baolin Wang
2022-09-05 14:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-06 5:53 ` Baolin Wang
2022-09-06 2:12 ` John Hubbard
2022-09-06 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-06 13:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-06 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-06 14:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-06 14:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-06 15:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-06 19:11 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-06 23:16 ` John Hubbard
2022-09-06 19:01 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-05 9:03 ` Baolin Wang
2022-09-06 18:50 ` Yang Shi
2022-09-06 21:27 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxJot6JbFl0HnXq3@xz-m1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox