From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
ardb@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64, kdump: enforce to take 4G as the crashkernel low memory end
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 09:57:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwrLiNXtNq/JFsYG@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220828005545.94389-1-bhe@redhat.com>
Forgot adding Nicolas when sending patch, add now.
On 08/28/22 at 08:55am, Baoquan He wrote:
> Problem:
> =======
> On arm64, block and section mapping is supported to build page tables.
> However, currently it enforces to take base page mapping for the whole
> linear mapping if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is enabled and
> crashkernel kernel parameter is set. This will cause longer time of the
> linear mapping process during bootup and severe performance degradation
> during running time.
>
> Root cause:
> ==========
> On arm64, crashkernel reservation relies on knowing the upper limit of
> low memory zone because it needs to reserve memory in the zone so that
> devices' DMA addressing in kdump kernel can be satisfied. However, the
> limit on arm64 is variant. And the upper limit can only be decided late
> till bootmem_init() is called.
>
> And we need to map the crashkernel region with base page granularity when
> doing linear mapping, because kdump needs to protect the crashkernel region
> via set_memory_valid(,0) after kdump kernel loading. However, arm64 doesn't
> support well on splitting the built block or section mapping due to some
> cpu reststriction [1]. And unfortunately, the linear mapping is done before
> bootmem_init().
>
> To resolve the above conflict on arm64, the compromise is enforcing to
> take base page mapping for the entire linear mapping if crashkernel is
> set, and CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is enabed. Hence
> performance is sacrificed.
>
> Solution:
> =========
> To fix the problem, we should always take 4G as the crashkernel low
> memory end in case CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is enabled.
> With this, we don't need to defer the crashkernel reservation till
> bootmem_init() is called to set the arm64_dma_phys_limit. As long as
> memblock init is done, we can conclude what is the upper limit of low
> memory zone.
>
> 1) both CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 are disabled or memblock_start_of_DRAM() > 4G
> limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX+1 (Corner cases)
> 2) CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 are enabled:
> limit = 4G (generic case)
>
> Justification:
> ==============
> In fact, kdump kernel doesn't need to cover all peripherals'
> addressing bits. Only device taken as dump target need be taken care of
> and its addressing bits need be satified. Currently, there are two kinds
> of dumping, dumped to local storage disk or dumped through network card to
> remove storage server. It means only storage disk or netowrk card taken
> as dump target need be consider if their addressing bits are satisfied.
> For saving memory, we usually generate kdump specific initramfs including
> necessary kernel modules for dump target devices. All other unnecessary
> kernel modules are excluded and their correspondent devices won't be
> initialized during kdump kernel bootup.
>
> So far, only Raspberry Pi 4 has some peripherals whcih can only address
> 30 bits memory range as reported in [2]. Devices on all other arm64 systems
> can address 32bits memory range.
>
> So by enforcing to take 4G as the crashkernel low memory end, the only
> risk is if RPi4 owns storage disk or network card which can't address
> 32bits memory range because they could be set as dump target. Even if
> RPi4 truly has storage devices or network card which can only address 30
> bits memory range, it should be a corner case. We can document it since
> crashkernel is more taken as a feature on server. Besides, RPi4 still can
> use crashkernel=xM@yM to sepcify a location for 32bits addressing if it
> really has that kind of storage device or network card and kdump is expected.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/YrIIJkhKWSuAqkCx@arm.com/T/#u
>
> [2]
> [PATCH v6 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190911182546.17094-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de/T/
>
>
> ======
> Question to Nicolas:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> In cover letter of [2] patchset, you told RPi4 has peripherals which
> can only address 30bits range. In below sentence, do you mean "the PCIe,
> V3D, GENET" can't address 32bit range, or they have wider view of
> address space the same as 40-bit DMA channels? I am confused about that.
>
> And the storage device or network card on RPi4 can address 32bit range
> or 32bit range, do we have document or do you happen to know that?
>
> """
> The new Raspberry Pi 4 has up to 4GB of memory but most peripherals can
> only address the first GB: their DMA address range is
> 0xc0000000-0xfc000000 which is aliased to the first GB of physical
> memory 0x00000000-0x3c000000. Note that only some peripherals have these
> limitations: the PCIe, V3D, GENET, and 40-bit DMA channels have a wider
> view of the address space by virtue of being hooked up trough a second
> interconnect.
> """
>
>
> Baoquan He (2):
> arm64, kdump: enforce to take 4G as the crashkernel low memory end
> arm64: remove unneed defer_reserve_crashkernel() and crash_mem_map
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 5 ----
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 24 ++++++++-------
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 53 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 10d4879f9ef01cc6190fafe4257d06f375bab92c
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-28 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-28 0:55 Baoquan He
2022-08-28 0:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Baoquan He
2022-08-31 1:50 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-31 7:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-08-31 14:29 ` Baoquan He
2022-09-01 7:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-01 12:25 ` Baoquan He
2022-09-05 10:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-05 12:08 ` Baoquan He
2022-09-06 13:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-08 13:33 ` Baoquan He
2022-09-08 22:55 ` Baoquan He
2022-09-21 7:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-30 7:04 ` Baoquan He
2022-09-30 9:24 ` Baoquan He
2022-08-28 0:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: remove unneed defer_reserve_crashkernel() and crash_mem_map Baoquan He
2022-08-31 1:51 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-08-28 1:57 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwrLiNXtNq/JFsYG@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox