From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549E7ECAAA3 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C2212940008; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 03:40:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BD23E940007; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 03:40:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A9A41940008; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 03:40:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A131940007 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 03:40:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D6FAB018 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:40:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79840947270.16.7254D74 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B9F4000D for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB73F33687; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:40:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1661499652; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UHDVWf627GrJFHwQC3okbVaIrG2oRgmMy8dX9XM3OOM=; b=ZmHi+NO43BUhjvggOCnhKFHErKsuWYJ+x+g1jKVaY9jmCwjT82lKzzRIaBhKtqCCDoic8j Pl4s3unhkexk+8F1dJY6GQWngCSyfu4/CDrl+c88r4Z8Y4BQszgJ0+A+LoOYRYkb8zfcvh wvzYrmtWKwEqTlvh8O7VFJGBW6BKP8I= Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E4013A7E; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id xvjWJgR5CGO+EgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:40:52 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:40:52 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Charan Teja Kalla Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, shakeelb@google.com, sieberf@amazon.com, sjpark@amazon.de, william.kucharski@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com, minchan@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] mm: fix use-after free of page_ext after race with memory-offline Message-ID: References: <1661496993-11473-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1661496993-11473-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1661499654; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=UHDVWf627GrJFHwQC3okbVaIrG2oRgmMy8dX9XM3OOM=; b=1dSqZk2Fn/83C/SafX+azrXI0szWuup/b++CQRxIGipwRRGnhth2gLau/aC/8U2EoyTM1J yANgtc5N+qRnSIUEVIgv5ZJUoeKUHmA7WRYTOG8MzprLtWawH5ClUNNw4sD27Z8HJXyKkN Qo2xfV6PMmqPsxK0IJSqXjzqMIJTCsA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=ZmHi+NO4; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1661499654; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ty7DFW5+lZN50mH4PEAYhntjLmFL3oDLM0odCK8CUUqu54wHiesx3M6Xcv/STbRTdF5Iyc uhSYdcILXuWz3lIZzW/Gjhi6OqbKbDhQYvcUs923+rnCUELiTeEs+jvCdO1jHlrnfDz32J xGLPJpr81P47LTOg9h3w/RraCTuzIy0= Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=ZmHi+NO4; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 09B9F4000D X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Stat-Signature: 1pdq8krz4bifx9sga3ze5w6ka48yz5y5 X-HE-Tag: 1661499653-656182 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri 26-08-22 12:26:33, Charan Teja Kalla wrote: > The below is one path where race between page_ext and offline of the > respective memory blocks will cause use-after-free on the access of > page_ext structure. > > process1 process2 > --------- --------- > a)doing /proc/page_owner doing memory offline > through offline_pages. > > b)PageBuddy check is failed > thus proceed to get the > page_owner information > through page_ext access. > page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page); > > migrate_pages(); > ................. > Since all pages are successfully > migrated as part of the offline > operation,send MEM_OFFLINE notification > where for page_ext it calls: > offline_page_ext()--> > __free_page_ext()--> > free_page_ext()--> > vfree(ms->page_ext) > mem_section->page_ext = NULL > > c) Check for the PAGE_EXT flags > in the page_ext->flags access > results into the use-after-free(leading > to the translation faults). > > As mentioned above, there is really no synchronization between page_ext > access and its freeing in the memory_offline. > > The memory offline steps(roughly) on a memory block is as below: > 1) Isolate all the pages > 2) while(1) > try free the pages to buddy.(->free_list[MIGRATE_ISOLATE]) > 3) delete the pages from this buddy list. > 4) Then free page_ext.(Note: The struct page is still alive as it is > freed only during hot remove of the memory which frees the memmap, which > steps the user might not perform). > > This design leads to the state where struct page is alive but the struct > page_ext is freed, where the later is ideally part of the former which > just representing the page_flags (check [3] for why this design is > chosen). > > The above mentioned race is just one example __but the problem persists > in the other paths too involving page_ext->flags access(eg: > page_is_idle())__. > > Fix all the paths where offline races with page_ext access by > maintaining synchronization with rcu lock and is achieved in 3 steps: > 1) Invalidate all the page_ext's of the sections of a memory block by > storing a flag in the LSB of mem_section->page_ext. > > 2) Wait till all the existing readers to finish working with the > ->page_ext's with synchronize_rcu(). Any parallel process that starts > after this call will not get page_ext, through lookup_page_ext(), for > the block parallel offline operation is being performed. > > 3) Now safely free all sections ->page_ext's of the block on which > offline operation is being performed. > > Note: If synchronize_rcu() takes time then optimizations can be done in > this path through call_rcu()[2]. > > Thanks to David Hildenbrand for his views/suggestions on the initial > discussion[1] and Pavan kondeti for various inputs on this patch. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/59edde13-4167-8550-86f0-11fc67882107@quicinc.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/a26ce299-aed1-b8ad-711e-a49e82bdd180@quicinc.com/T/#u > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6fa6b7aa-731e-891c-3efb-a03d6a700efa@redhat.com/ > > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko > Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla > --- > Changes in V5: > o Used the loop variable name as ext_put_continue -- David If this is the only change since the last version (I didn't have much time to read through the whole patch) then my ack still applies. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs