From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Michal Koutn?? <mkoutny@suse.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
"Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"lkp@lists.01.org" <lkp@lists.01.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page_counter fields
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:10:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwLlsr0jNq5m6v8z@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822001737.4120417-3-shakeelb@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:17:36AM +0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> With memcg v2 enabled, memcg->memory.usage is a very hot member for
> the workloads doing memcg charging on multiple CPUs concurrently.
> Particularly the network intensive workloads. In addition, there is a
> false cache sharing between memory.usage and memory.high on the charge
> path. This patch moves the usage into a separate cacheline and move all
> the read most fields into separate cacheline.
>
> To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we
> ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy with top
> level having min and low setup appropriately. More specifically
> memory.min equal to size of netperf binary and memory.low double of
> that.
>
> $ netserver -6
> # 36 instances of netperf with following params
> $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K
>
> Results (average throughput of netperf):
> Without (6.0-rc1) 10482.7 Mbps
> With patch 12413.7 Mbps (18.4% improvement)
>
> With the patch, the throughput improved by 18.4%.
>
> One side-effect of this patch is the increase in the size of struct
> mem_cgroup. However for the performance improvement, this additional
> size is worth it. In addition there are opportunities to reduce the size
> of struct mem_cgroup like deprecation of kmem and tcpmem page counters
> and better packing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Looks good to me, with one nit below.
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/page_counter.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> index 679591301994..8ce99bde645f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> @@ -3,15 +3,27 @@
> #define _LINUX_PAGE_COUNTER_H
>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/cache.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +struct pc_padding {
> + char x[0];
> +} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> +#define PC_PADDING(name) struct pc_padding name
> +#else
> +#define PC_PADDING(name)
> +#endif
There are 2 similar padding definitions in mmzone.h and memcontrol.h:
struct memcg_padding {
char x[0];
} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
#define MEMCG_PADDING(name) struct memcg_padding name
struct zone_padding {
char x[0];
} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
#define ZONE_PADDING(name) struct zone_padding name;
Maybe we can generalize them, and lift it into include/cache.h? so
that more places can reuse it in future.
Thanks,
Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 0:17 [PATCH 0/3] memcg: optimizatize charge codepath Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 0:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_counter: remove unneeded atomic ops for low/min Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 0:20 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2022-08-22 2:39 ` Feng Tang
[not found] ` <YwNSlZFPMgclrSCz@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2022-08-22 10:18 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-22 14:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-22 16:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 18:23 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-22 0:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page_counter fields Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 0:24 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2022-08-22 4:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 2:10 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-08-22 4:59 ` Shakeel Butt
[not found] ` <YwNZD4YlRkvQCWFi@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2022-08-22 15:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-22 16:04 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 18:27 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-22 0:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64 Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 0:24 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2022-08-22 2:30 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-22 10:47 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-22 15:09 ` Shakeel Butt
[not found] ` <YwOfP/6PtS8BxNhz@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2022-08-22 16:07 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-22 18:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-22 19:34 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-23 2:22 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-23 4:49 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwLlsr0jNq5m6v8z@feng-clx \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox