linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
	Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	paulus@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/migrate_device.c: Copy pte dirty bit to page
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:44:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv5QXkS4Bm9pTBeG@xz-m1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czcyawl6.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 02:34:45PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > In this specific case, the only way to do safe tlb batching in my mind is:
> >
> > 	pte_offset_map_lock();
> > 	arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> >         // If any pending tlb, do it now
> >         if (mm_tlb_flush_pending())
> > 		flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end);
> >         else
> >                 flush_tlb_batched_pending();
> 
> I don't think we need the above 4 lines.  Because we will flush TLB
> before we access the pages.

Could you elaborate?

> Can you find any issue if we don't use the above 4 lines?

It seems okay to me to leave stall tlb at least within the scope of this
function. It only collects present ptes and flush propoerly for them.  I
don't quickly see any other implications to other not touched ptes - unlike
e.g. mprotect(), there's a strong barrier of not allowing further write
after mprotect() returns.

Still I don't know whether there'll be any side effect of having stall tlbs
in !present ptes because I'm not familiar enough with the private dev swap
migration code.  But I think having them will be safe, even if redundant.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16  7:39 Alistair Popple
2022-08-16  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/hmm-tests: Add test for dirty bits Alistair Popple
2022-08-16  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/migrate_device.c: Copy pte dirty bit to page huang ying
2022-08-16 20:35   ` Peter Xu
2022-08-17  1:49     ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-17  2:45       ` Peter Xu
2022-08-17  5:41         ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-17  7:17           ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-17  9:41             ` Nadav Amit
2022-08-17 19:27               ` Peter Xu
2022-08-18  6:34                 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-18 14:44                   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-08-19  2:51                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-24  1:56                       ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-24 20:25                         ` Peter Xu
2022-08-24 20:48                           ` Peter Xu
2022-08-25  0:42                             ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-25  1:24                               ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-25 15:04                                 ` Peter Xu
2022-08-25 22:09                                   ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-25 23:36                                     ` Peter Xu
2022-08-25 14:40                               ` Peter Xu
2022-08-18  5:59               ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-17 19:07           ` Peter Xu
2022-08-17  1:38   ` Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yv5QXkS4Bm9pTBeG@xz-m1.local \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox