From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910EC19F28 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 709FC8E0001; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:32:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6B9836B0073; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:32:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 580DE8E0001; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:32:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472F96B0072 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:32:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E89A1557 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:32:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79758672630.12.24BC711 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86966C0110 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:32:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1659540731; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I5DoF9QnhbSvdXZ4X9NJFcHI04yMzxl+q+UCYUrzmTM=; b=AtwCvC3bY30HW6JzMPG+OBIKmAFV326sbHITjqqegRCcX1usK94B3HBwDFPrRQbiav4BlJ tKBrVNYVF5x/iSgBe1/qtsQ54Y3kMRr3zwFlcKQaxy2qtrvl/qBsVfm2TT0aEgs0KlIqjp UnT5WJkS/zVP8OFN176HiGMNAh08eEE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-192-d-nvaxZuP0e3N9yibB2CqQ-1; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:32:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: d-nvaxZuP0e3N9yibB2CqQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CAE41035371; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-13-216.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.216]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90156C28100; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:32:03 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Michal Hocko Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , John Donnelly , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma/pool: do not complain if DMA pool is not allocated Message-ID: References: <20220325122559.14251-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20220325164856.GA16800@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1659540733; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WPclKyYqXpVbzT0EZaJ+m9K0UBZasGEGVpF/Zf49WfHt+0OLnqLbPD4CPSUQSJU4A7Vqwe 4+v58iDZeZq6MiMu+Kc3Y7GU/QeDK0L0bR7sQd/D+SPl+QyJXpn1/DGcGryLb0T71KaTHa zOj+lFvqacukIjrpNxt/NdlX2itusko= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=AtwCvC3b; spf=pass (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of bhe@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bhe@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1659540733; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=I5DoF9QnhbSvdXZ4X9NJFcHI04yMzxl+q+UCYUrzmTM=; b=O53oTIssY56GVq+EnDKHTJssN9QlTeGsCrmN9ZNMhA6y4MWg1NAuXoGsOsyyhZqMNkS7sJ Src74LJUIRxcZLyRtoJxwHmCfjP4ubU/Im/tUjQWCv1IOnN8dxgr5q8lyTJun9BwoH5XCb mNz2XfvwLTwuCccwqqhlNGVbxNa4qy4= X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: f7ant63o3oyppy5z5nrjg9kwsq81ctny X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 86966C0110 Authentication-Results: imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=AtwCvC3b; spf=pass (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of bhe@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bhe@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-HE-Tag: 1659540732-981963 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 08/03/22 at 05:05pm, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 03-08-22 22:59:26, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 08/03/22 at 11:52am, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Fri 25-03-22 17:54:33, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Fri 25-03-22 17:48:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > Dang, I have just realized that I have misread the boot log and it has > > > > > > turned out that a674e48c5443 is covering my situation because the > > > > > > allocation failure message says: > > > > > > > > > > > > Node 0 DMA free:0kB boost:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB reserved_highatomic:0KB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:636kB managed:0kB mlocked:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB > > > > > > > > > > As in your report is from a kernel that does not have a674e48c5443 > > > > > yet? > > > > > > > > yes. I just mixed up the early boot messages and thought that DMA zone > > > > ended up with a single page. That message was saying something else > > > > though. > > > > > > OK, so I have another machine spewing this warning. Still on an older > > > kernel but I do not think the current upstream would be any different in > > > that regards. This time the DMA zone is populated and consumed from > > > large part and the pool size request is just too large for it: > > > > > > [ 14.017417][ T1] swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:10, mode:0xcc1(GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0-7 > > > [ 14.017429][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.21-150400.22-default #1 SLE15-SP4 0b6a6578ade2de5c4a0b916095dff44f76ef1704 > > > [ 14.017434][ T1] Hardware name: XXXX > > > [ 14.017437][ T1] Call Trace: > > > [ 14.017444][ T1] > > > [ 14.017449][ T1] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x57 > > > [ 14.017469][ T1] warn_alloc+0xfe/0x160 > > > [ 14.017490][ T1] __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.112+0xc27/0xc60 > > > [ 14.017497][ T1] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b > > > [ 14.017509][ T1] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b > > > [ 14.017512][ T1] __alloc_pages+0x2d5/0x320 > > > [ 14.017517][ T1] alloc_page_interleave+0xf/0x70 > > > [ 14.017531][ T1] atomic_pool_expand+0x4a/0x200 > > > [ 14.017541][ T1] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b > > > [ 14.017544][ T1] __dma_atomic_pool_init+0x44/0x90 > > > [ 14.017556][ T1] dma_atomic_pool_init+0xad/0x13f > > > [ 14.017560][ T1] ? __dma_atomic_pool_init+0x90/0x90 > > > [ 14.017562][ T1] do_one_initcall+0x41/0x200 > > > [ 14.017581][ T1] kernel_init_freeable+0x236/0x298 > > > [ 14.017589][ T1] ? rest_init+0xd0/0xd0 > > > [ 14.017596][ T1] kernel_init+0x16/0x120 > > > [ 14.017599][ T1] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > > > [ 14.017604][ T1] > > > [...] > > > [ 14.018026][ T1] Node 0 DMA free:160kB boost:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB reserved_highatomic:0KB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:15996kB managed:15360kB mlocked:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB > > > [ 14.018035][ T1] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 0 > > > [ 14.018339][ T1] Node 0 DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB (U) 0*64kB 1*128kB (U) 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 160kB > > > > > > So the DMA zone has only 160kB free while the pool would like to use 4MB > > > of it which obviously fails. I haven't tried to check who is consuming > > > the DMA zone memory and why but this shouldn't be all that important > > > because the pool clearly cannot allocate and there is not much the > > > user/admin can do about that. Well, the pool could be explicitly > > > requested smaller but is that really what we expect them to do? > > > > > > > > > I thought there are only few pages in the managed by the DMA zone. This > > > > > > is still theoretically possible so I think __GFP_NOWARN makes sense here > > > > > > but it would require to change the patch description. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this really worth it? > > > > > > > > > > In general I think for kernels where we need the pool and can't allocate > > > > > it, a warning is very useful. We just shouldn't spew it when there is > > > > > no need for the pool to start with. > > > > > > > > Well, do we have any way to find that out during early boot? > > > > > > Thinking about it. We should get a warning when the actual allocation > > > from the pool fails no? That would be more useful information than the > > > pre-allocation failure when it is not really clear whether anybody is > > > ever going to consume it. > > > > Hi Michal, > > > > You haven't told on which ARCH you met this issue, is it x86_64? > > yes x86_64, so a small 16MB DMA zone. Yeah, the 16M DMA zone is redicilous and exists only for hardly seen ISA-style devices support. Haven't prepared the log well. >From 0b32b4c441f9e28bbda06eefbd14c25d00924830 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baoquan He Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:26:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86, 64: let zone DMA cover low 4G if no ISA-style devices Content-type: text/plain It doesn't make sense to let the rare legacy ISA-style devies drag x86_64 to have a tiny zone DMA of 16M which cause many troubles. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 - arch/x86/mm/init.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 5aa4c2ecf5c7..93af781f9445 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -2761,7 +2761,6 @@ config ISA_BUS # x86_64 have no ISA slots, but can have ISA-style DMA. config ISA_DMA_API bool "ISA-style DMA support" if (X86_64 && EXPERT) - default y help Enables ISA-style DMA support for devices requiring such controllers. If unsure, say Y. diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c index 82a042c03824..c9ffb38dcc6a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c @@ -1024,9 +1024,12 @@ void __init zone_sizes_init(void) memset(max_zone_pfns, 0, sizeof(max_zone_pfns)); -#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA +#if defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) && defined(CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API) max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = min(MAX_DMA_PFN, max_low_pfn); +#else + max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = min(MAX_DMA32_PFN, max_low_pfn); #endif + #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = min(MAX_DMA32_PFN, max_low_pfn); #endif -- 2.34.1