From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
minchan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/gup.c: Simplify and fix check_and_migrate_movable_pages() return codes
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:50:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YukrqnbnkltxVHvM@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <814dee5d3aadd38c3370eaaf438ba7eee9bf9d2b.1659399696.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 10:30:12AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> When pinning pages with FOLL_LONGTERM check_and_migrate_movable_pages()
> is called to migrate pages out of zones which should not contain any
> longterm pinned pages.
>
> When migration succeeds all pages will have been unpinned so pinning
> needs to be retried. This is indicated by returning zero. When all pages
> are in the correct zone the number of pinned pages is returned.
>
> However migration can also fail, in which case pages are unpinned and
> -ENOMEM is returned. However if the failure was due to not being unable
> to isolate a page zero is returned. This leads to indefinite looping in
> __gup_longterm_locked().
>
> Fix this by simplifying the return codes such that zero indicates all
> pages were successfully pinned in the correct zone while errors indicate
> either pages were migrated and pinning should be retried or that
> migration has failed and therefore the pinning operation should fail.
>
> This fixes the indefinite looping on page isolation failure by failing
> the pin operation instead of retrying indefinitely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes for v2:
> - Changed error handling to be move conventional using goto as
> suggested by Jason.
> - Removed coherent_pages check as it isn't necessary.
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 364b274..5707c56 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1901,20 +1901,24 @@ struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> /*
> - * Check whether all pages are pinnable, if so return number of pages. If some
> - * pages are not pinnable, migrate them, and unpin all pages. Return zero if
> - * pages were migrated, or if some pages were not successfully isolated.
> - * Return negative error if migration fails.
> + * Check whether all pages are pinnable. If some pages are not pinnable migrate
> + * them and unpin all the pages. Returns -EAGAIN if pages were unpinned or zero
> + * if all pages are pinnable and in the right zone. Other errors indicate
> + * migration failure.
> */
> static long check_and_migrate_movable_pages(unsigned long nr_pages,
> struct page **pages,
> unsigned int gup_flags)
> {
> - unsigned long isolation_error_count = 0, i;
> + unsigned long i;
> struct folio *prev_folio = NULL;
> LIST_HEAD(movable_page_list);
> - bool drain_allow = true, coherent_pages = false;
> - int ret = 0;
> + bool drain_allow = true;
> + int ret = -EAGAIN;
It looked like every goto error set this? Why initialize it?
It looks OK to me, a lot clearer
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 0:30 Alistair Popple
2022-08-02 13:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-08-02 21:36 ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-08-04 0:01 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-03 0:12 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-04 0:12 ` Alistair Popple
2022-08-04 7:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-04 9:57 ` Alistair Popple
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YukrqnbnkltxVHvM@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox