From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Ray Fucillo <Ray.Fucillo@intersystems.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlbfs: catch and handle truncate racing with page faults
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:00:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuGLT+RlCynFM9Z4@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee6af38d-f797-a64f-e5c4-78bad3753aca@huawei.com>
On 07/27/22 17:20, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/7/7 4:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > Most hugetlb fault handling code checks for faults beyond i_size.
> > While there are early checks in the code paths, the most difficult
> > to handle are those discovered after taking the page table lock.
> > At this point, we have possibly allocated a page and consumed
> > associated reservations and possibly added the page to the page cache.
> >
> > When discovering a fault beyond i_size, be sure to:
> > - Remove the page from page cache, else it will sit there until the
> > file is removed.
> > - Do not restore any reservation for the page consumed. Otherwise
> > there will be an outstanding reservation for an offset beyond the
> > end of file.
> >
> > The 'truncation' code in remove_inode_hugepages must deal with fault
> > code potentially removing a page/folio from the cache after the page was
> > returned by filemap_get_folios and before locking the page. This can be
> > discovered by a change in folio_mapping() after taking folio lock. In
> > addition, this code must deal with fault code potentially consuming
> > and returning reservations. To synchronize this, remove_inode_hugepages
> > will now take the fault mutex for ALL indices in the hole or truncated
> > range. In this way, it KNOWS fault code has finished with the page/index
> > OR fault code will see the updated file size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> > ---
>
> <snip>
>
> > @@ -5606,8 +5610,10 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >
> > ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
> > size = i_size_read(mapping->host) >> huge_page_shift(h);
> > - if (idx >= size)
> > + if (idx >= size) {
> > + beyond_i_size = true;
>
> Thanks for your patch. There is one question:
>
> Since races between hugetlb pagefault and truncate is guarded by hugetlb_fault_mutex,
> do we really need to check it again after taking the page table lock?
>
Well, the fault mutex can only guard a single hugetlb page. The fault mutex
is actually an array/table of mutexes hashed by mapping address and file index.
So, during truncation we take take the mutex for each page as they are
unmapped and removed. So, the fault mutex only synchronizes operations
on one specific page. The idea with this patch is to coordinate the fault
code and truncate code when operating on the same page.
In addition, changing the file size happens early in the truncate process
before taking any locks/mutexes.
--
Mike Kravetz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-06 20:23 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] hugetlb: Change huge pmd sharing synchronization again Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] hugetlbfs: revert use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate race Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] hugetlbfs: revert use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing synchronization Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] hugetlbfs: move routine remove_huge_page to hugetlb.c Mike Kravetz
2022-08-05 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlbfs: catch and handle truncate racing with page faults Mike Kravetz
2022-07-27 9:20 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-27 19:00 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2022-07-28 2:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-28 16:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-05 16:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-05 22:41 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] hugetlb: rename vma_shareable() and refactor code Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] hugetlb: add vma based lock for pmd sharing synchronization Mike Kravetz
2022-07-29 2:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-29 18:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-30 2:12 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] hugetlb: create hugetlb_unmap_file_folio to unmap single file folio Mike Kravetz
2022-07-29 2:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-29 18:11 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-30 2:15 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization Mike Kravetz
2022-07-28 6:51 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-28 17:47 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-29 1:41 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-29 17:41 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-30 1:57 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-20 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] hugetlb: Change huge pmd sharing synchronization again Ray Fucillo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YuGLT+RlCynFM9Z4@monkey \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=Ray.Fucillo@intersystems.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox