linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] mm/hugetlb: possible data leak with huge pmd sharing
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:18:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuAh0JQL9zQwfZkg@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ec4cd05-5b3a-cd5c-7785-5a7236804bef@huawei.com>

On 07/26/22 15:14, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/7/26 2:35, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > On 07/25/22 17:07, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> Hi all:
> >>     When I investigate the mm/hugetlb code, I found there's a possible data leak issue
> >> with huge pmd sharing. Thank about the below scene:
> >>
> >>     1. Process A and process B shares huge pmd page.(vm_flags: VM_MAYSHARE but !VM_SHARED)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > I often get confused about the setting of VM_MAYSHARE and VM_SHARED.  When
> > you throw in the possibility of shared and anonymous, then I struggle a bit
> > more.  At one time did an audit to get the meaning clear in my mind, but still
> > struggle with the meanings.
> > 
> > Is it possible to have VM_MAYSHARE and !VM_SHARED on a hugetlb vma?  I only
> > took a quick look and could not find a way for this to happen.  But, I> could have easily missed something.
> 
> Thanks for your reply. It's possible to have VM_MAYSHARE and !VM_SHARED on a hugetlb vma
> with below code snippet:
> 
> ...
>     fd = open("/root/huge/hugepagefile", O_CREAT | O_RDONLY, 0755);
>     if (fd < 0) {
>             perror("Open failed");
>             exit(1);
>     }
> 
>     addr = mmap(0, 32UL*1024*1024, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> ...
> 
> cat /proc/<pid>/smaps:
> 
> 400000000000-400002000000 r--s 00000000 00:2f 153780886                  /root/huge/hugepagefile
> Size:              32768 kB
> KernelPageSize:     2048 kB
> MMUPageSize:        2048 kB
> ...
> VmFlags: rd mr me ms de ht
> 
> /* sh: VM_SHARED, mw: VM_MAYWRITE, ms:VM_MAYSHARE */
> 
> So vm_flags is VM_MAYSHARE but !VM_SHARED.
> 
> But in this case, it's readonly. So the above scene won't happen. Sorry for make noise.
> 

No worries!  And, thank you for looking at the pmd sharing code.  In concept
the functionality is simple.  However, details and edge cases make things
complicated.

If you are interested in the pmd sharing code, more eyes on this proposal
would be appreciated.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220706202347.95150-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com/

-- 
Mike Kravetz


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-26 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-25  9:07 Miaohe Lin
2022-07-25 18:35 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-26  7:14   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-26 17:18     ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2022-07-27  1:49       ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YuAh0JQL9zQwfZkg@monkey \
    --to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox