From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MM updates for 5.20-rc1
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:04:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yu2wDNcOYE0RdkA3@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiOSXvk=70tpR9E1tvDmCf8s-81bT+92aE-iKocxdTsyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 04:32:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:35 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > - memcg debug/visibility work from Roman Gushchin
>
> Well, not just memcg.
>
> There's that new CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG too.
>
> Which looks like yet another "people add Kconfig options incorrectly".
>
> We don't make new features "default y" unless there's some truly
> pressing reason for it (ie "99.9% of all people will want this" or "we
> used to always compile this in, now it's optional").
Hi Linus!
It actually was 'default n' in one of the earlier version of the patchset
and has been switched to 'default y' based on the following feedback from
Dave Chinner (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YmiWK56bOHyrr64u@rh/):
No. The argument that "if we turn it off there's no overhead" means
one of two things:
1. nobody turns it on and it never gets tested and so bitrots and is
useless, or
2. distro's all turn it on because some tool they ship or customer
they ship to wants it.
Either way, hiding it behind a config option is not an acceptible
solution for mering poorly thought out infrastructure.
Personally I think that the feature is not that useful for the majority
of users (this is why default was n), but it's not adding much of the
overhead, so I had no strong reasons to oppose Dave.
Cc'ing him just in case.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-06 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 20:35 Andrew Morton
2022-08-05 23:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-06 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-05 23:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-06 0:04 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2022-08-06 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-06 1:43 ` Joe Perches
2022-08-05 23:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-08-07 5:14 Yury Norov
2022-08-07 20:11 ` Sander Vanheule
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yu2wDNcOYE0RdkA3@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox