From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82A7C433EF for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2ADF38E0115; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 25E446B020C; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:51:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 14C1D8E0115; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:51:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070F76B020B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA453613AA for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:51:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79609184466.14.CD2D0DB Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DEB1C001F for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:51:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1655981492; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Rt62F0DwW/EmXD1WWsZVPFxILSy2pYZ1XM+8hUl5XBA=; b=i2h6ef4eHwEmHv8DRCMMFSvOm93csTza5Ki/7CTSfY9cMIAJjtdZ7+rsiWoFk5eo8RbHWx bQzUwoZOoh2Vn9HBMO8qvUMlujdvbtljNJip6c9BaL2K3mlaoJI4MWoGNc7KeMmJLyAxXw pdmnwewx05pZLLTwI4AJbAv3iyhjwd4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-413-ovcjf1MzPvGB6-B-_Q15Vg-1; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:51:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ovcjf1MzPvGB6-B-_Q15Vg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA92E294EDD5; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-13-154.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.154]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7B7C28115; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:51:18 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Zhipeng Shi Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, shengjian.xu@horizon.ai, schspa@gmail.com, longman@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Question] vmalloc latency in RT-Linux Message-ID: References: <20220621121547.GB37196@ubuntu20> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220621121547.GB37196@ubuntu20> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655981493; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=8HBn6VYK4xai3ZHn5E/WThuvXhPOKlVjaYGRWlS27pxJzDi+nJokNbJMGlLA2cYu0JLL98 uiIq6Q14eJwbHVlxOxATW1wFZEZ2Jg/4PrldNJ0Bhj4nqHZvVIDOWi2NpOhF1xubFbZd+P IXVdhUkCoiFmI9oGuH9UTh345LHal6o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=i2h6ef4e; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of bhe@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.129.124) smtp.mailfrom=bhe@redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655981493; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Rt62F0DwW/EmXD1WWsZVPFxILSy2pYZ1XM+8hUl5XBA=; b=3I93hvdKHu0GJ8UmvHHf+9yQrLrhXG3xoj/ZIGesPjy8Qwou1uh7MdmakVQJRXAOT4QL3i TABGGEGGpQF8MdFzGYyMvGekMOx3xm4GeUqo9PCp+mOcSlBz2yD4nrVUvMDABBmHHJEYfR 9jVaIl4sLzyrO7SufX+H/PoHJNoFNQE= X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 66DEB1C001F Authentication-Results: imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=i2h6ef4e; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of bhe@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.129.124) smtp.mailfrom=bhe@redhat.com X-Stat-Signature: xw5tncyxibd5k1mp8q51g5hdsiquocyr X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1655981493-917467 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 06/21/22 at 08:15pm, Zhipeng Shi wrote: > I noticed in rt-linux, vmalloc has a large latency. This is because the > free_vmap_area_lock is held for a long time in the function > __purge_vmap_area_lazy. > > In non-RT-Linux, because the function spin_is_contended is well > implemented, so there will be no such problem. > > But in RT-Linux, spin_is_contended simply returns 0. I don't understand > why this function was implemented like this before, but in order to > solve this problem, I thought of two ways. > > The first is to modify the spin_is_contended definition in spinlock_rt.h > as shown below, but I'm not sure if the change has side-effects: > > -#define spin_is_contended(lock) (((void)(lock), 0)) > +static inline int spin_is_contended(spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->lock.owner; > + > + return (READ_ONCE(*p) & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); > +} > > The second is by reducing the number of lazy_max_pages, but it will lead > to lower performance of vmalloc. __purge_vmap_area_lazy() has cond_resched_lock() to reschedule and drop the lock. From your saying, it's spin_is_contended() which is not working well to make rescheduling happen during __purge_vmap_area_lazy() handling. Then the fixing should be done in lock side. > > Guys, Do you have any good ideas? > > Best regards, > Zhipeng >