From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
smuchun@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: make hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap compatible with memmap_on_memory
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:44:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrAzeHbYt1mAs9ue@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrAv18GnMOcQaAxz@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:29:11PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > Although it works, I think PageVmemmapSelfHosted() check for the 1st pfn's
> > > vmemmap page is not always reliable. Since we reused PG_owner_priv_1
> > > as PG_vmemmap_self_hosted, the test is noly reliable for vmemmap page's
> > > vmemmap page. Other non-vmemmap page can be flagged with PG_owner_priv_1.
> > > So this check can be false-positive. Maybe the following code snippet is
> > > the solution.
> >
> > How could that happen for pages used for backing a vmemmap?
> >
>
> It cannot happen for memmap_on_memory case. Howwver, it can happen for other
> cases. E.g. the 1st pfn (of boot memory block) whose vmemmap page may be flagged
> as PG_owner_priv_1 (if PG_swapcache is set). Then, the check is false-positive.
If this can really happen, which I am not that sure tbh, maybe a way out would be
to just define a new page-type as we did in previous versions of memmap_on_memory.
In that way we would not for flags, but for its type.
But as I said, I am not entirely sure about the potential fallout of what you mention.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-19 13:38 [PATCH v4 0/2] " Muchun Song
2022-06-19 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: memory_hotplug: enumerate all supported section flags Muchun Song
2022-06-20 7:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-20 8:16 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-19 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: make hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap compatible with memmap_on_memory Muchun Song
2022-06-20 7:22 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-20 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-20 8:29 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-20 8:44 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2022-06-20 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-20 9:05 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrAzeHbYt1mAs9ue@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox