From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: Move the stackdepot related allocation out of IRQ-off section.
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:48:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqQQimfVPQLmU4Lt@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yp9sqoUi4fVa5ExF@linutronix.de>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 05:20:10PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The set_track() invocation in free_debug_processing() is invoked with
> acquired slab_lock(). The lock disables interrupts on PREEMPT_RT and
> this forbids to allocate memory which is done in stack_depot_save().
Thanks, nice catch.
> Split set_track() into two parts: set_track_prepare() which allocate
> memory and set_track_update() which only performs the assignment of the
> trace data structure. Use set_track_prepare() before disabling
> interrupts.
>
> Fixes: 5cf909c553e9e ("mm/slub: use stackdepot to save stack trace in objects")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index e5535020e0fdf..ee0445ccb288c 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -726,19 +726,42 @@ static struct track *get_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> return kasan_reset_tag(p + alloc);
> }
>
> -static void noinline set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> - enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr)
> +static noinline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(void)
> {
> - struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
> -
> + depot_stack_handle_t handle = 0;
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> unsigned long entries[TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT];
> unsigned int nr_entries;
>
> nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 3);
> - p->handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_NOWAIT);
> + handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_NOWAIT);
> #endif
> + return handle;
> +}
>
> +static void set_track_update(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> + enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr,
> + depot_stack_handle_t handle)
> +{
> + struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> + p->handle = handle;
> +#endif
> + p->addr = addr;
> + p->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + p->pid = current->pid;
> + p->when = jiffies;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> + enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> + p->handle = set_track_prepare();
> +#endif
> p->addr = addr;
> p->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> p->pid = current->pid;
> @@ -1373,6 +1396,10 @@ static noinline int free_debug_processing(
> int cnt = 0;
> unsigned long flags, flags2;
> int ret = 0;
> + depot_stack_handle_t handle = 0;
> +
> + if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> + handle = set_track_prepare();
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> slab_lock(slab, &flags2);
> @@ -1391,7 +1418,7 @@ static noinline int free_debug_processing(
> }
>
> if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> - set_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE, addr);
> + set_track_update(s, object, TRACK_FREE, addr, handle);
> trace(s, slab, object, 0);
> /* Freepointer not overwritten by init_object(), SLAB_POISON moved it */
> init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
> --
> 2.36.1
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-11 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-07 15:20 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-11 3:48 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2022-06-13 15:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-14 7:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-14 8:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqQQimfVPQLmU4Lt@hyeyoo \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=glittao@gmail.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox