linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: Move the stackdepot related allocation out of IRQ-off section.
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:48:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqQQimfVPQLmU4Lt@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yp9sqoUi4fVa5ExF@linutronix.de>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 05:20:10PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The set_track() invocation in free_debug_processing() is invoked with
> acquired slab_lock(). The lock disables interrupts on PREEMPT_RT and
> this forbids to allocate memory which is done in stack_depot_save().

Thanks, nice catch.
 
> Split set_track() into two parts: set_track_prepare() which allocate
> memory and set_track_update() which only performs the assignment of the
> trace data structure. Use set_track_prepare() before disabling
> interrupts.
> 
> Fixes: 5cf909c553e9e ("mm/slub: use stackdepot to save stack trace in objects")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index e5535020e0fdf..ee0445ccb288c 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -726,19 +726,42 @@ static struct track *get_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
>  	return kasan_reset_tag(p + alloc);
>  }
>  
> -static void noinline set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> -			enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr)
> +static noinline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(void)
>  {
> -	struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
> -
> +	depot_stack_handle_t handle = 0;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
>  	unsigned long entries[TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT];
>  	unsigned int nr_entries;
>  
>  	nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 3);
> -	p->handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +	handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  #endif
> +	return handle;
> +}
>  
> +static void set_track_update(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> +			     enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr,
> +			     depot_stack_handle_t handle)
> +{
> +	struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +	p->handle = handle;
> +#endif
> +	p->addr = addr;
> +	p->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	p->pid = current->pid;
> +	p->when = jiffies;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> +				      enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +	p->handle = set_track_prepare();
> +#endif
>  	p->addr = addr;
>  	p->cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	p->pid = current->pid;
> @@ -1373,6 +1396,10 @@ static noinline int free_debug_processing(
>  	int cnt = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags, flags2;
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	depot_stack_handle_t handle = 0;
> +
> +	if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> +		handle = set_track_prepare();
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
>  	slab_lock(slab, &flags2);
> @@ -1391,7 +1418,7 @@ static noinline int free_debug_processing(
>  	}
>  
>  	if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> -		set_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE, addr);
> +		set_track_update(s, object, TRACK_FREE, addr, handle);
>  	trace(s, slab, object, 0);
>  	/* Freepointer not overwritten by init_object(), SLAB_POISON moved it */
>  	init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Hyeonggon


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-11  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-07 15:20 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-11  3:48 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2022-06-13 15:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-14  7:26   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-14  8:24     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqQQimfVPQLmU4Lt@hyeyoo \
    --to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glittao@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox