From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kasan: Fix ordering between MTE tag colouring and page->flags
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 19:32:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqI8zGRKa6GE+K1A@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZfZv3Q-2Xj1X6wEN13R6kJQbE_3EgzYMyZ8ZmWogf28Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andrey,
Sorry, I got distracted by the merging window.
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 07:16:03PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 2:24 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > If we skip unpoisoning (not just poisoning as we already do) for user
> > pages, we should reset the tags in page->flags. Whether __GFP_ZEROTAGS
> > is passed is complementary, depending on the reason for allocation.
>
> [...]
>
> > Currently if __GFP_ZEROTAGS is passed, the unpoisoning is skipped but I
> > think we should have just added __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON instead and
> > not add a new argument to should_skip_kasan_unpoison(). If we decide to
> > always skip unpoisoning, something like below on top of the vanilla
> > kernel:
>
> [...]
>
> > With the above, we can wire up page_kasan_tag_reset() to the
> > __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON check without any additional flags.
>
> This would make __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON do two logically unrelated
> things: skip setting memory tags and reset page tags. This seems
> weird.
Not entirely weird, it depends on how you look at it. After allocation,
you expect the accesses to page_address() to work, irrespective of the
GFP flags. __kasan_unpoison_pages() ensures that the page->flags match
the written tag without a new GFP flag to set the page->flags. If you
skip the unpoisoning something should reset the page->flags tag to
ensure an accessible page_address(). I find it weirder that you need
another GFP flag to pretty much say 'give me an accessible page'.
> I think it makes more sense to split __GFP_ZEROTAGS into
> __GFP_ZERO_MEMORY_TAGS and __GFP_ZERO_PAGE_TAGS: the first one does
> tag_clear_highpage() without page_kasan_tag_reset() and the second one
> does page_kasan_tag_reset() in post_alloc_hook(). Then, add
> __GFP_ZERO_PAGE_TAGS to GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE along with
> __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON and __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_POISON. And replace
> __GFP_ZEROTAGS with __GFP_ZERO_MEMORY_TAGS in
> alloc_zeroed_user_highpage_movable().
As above, my preference would be to avoid a new flag, just wire this up
to __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON. But if you do want fine-grained control, I
can add the above.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 18:09 Catalin Marinas
2022-05-17 18:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: kasan: Ensure the tags are visible before the tag in page->flags Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-17 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: kasan: Reset the tag on pages intended for user Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:15 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-17 18:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: kasan: Revert "arm64: mte: reset the page tag in page->flags" Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] kasan: Fix ordering between MTE tag colouring and page->flags Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-20 13:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:20 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-25 15:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-25 17:41 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-26 12:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-31 17:16 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-06-09 18:32 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-06-09 18:40 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqI8zGRKa6GE+K1A@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox