From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeelb@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
longman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:14:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ypg5DhrXCEAazDE9@FVFYT0MHHV2J.googleapis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220601173438.GC2434@blackbody.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 07:34:38PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello Muchun.
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:49:17PM +0800, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > +static inline bool obj_cgroup_is_root(struct obj_cgroup *objcg)
> > +{
> > + return objcg == root_obj_cgroup;
> > +}
>
> Admittedly, this predicate alone caught my eye, why it did not also
> check root_mem_cgroup->objcg_list.
> However, deeper look reveals it's purpose is to avoid missing uncharges
> of pages that were charged in non-root memcg and later re-associated
> upwards after reparenting.
Right.
> So it's like obj_cgroup_root_origin() (I'm not suggesting a rename, just
> illustrating the understanding).
>
> get_obj_cgroup_from_current() gains some complexity but it still holds
> that in root memcg neither kernel objects nor LRU pages are charged.
> At the same time, reparented kernel objects or LRU pages are properly
> uncharged.
>
> These parts are
> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
>
Thanks Michal.
> (I did not look into the locking guarantees with the new API though.)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-02 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-30 7:49 [PATCH v5 00/11] Use " Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code and comments Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} to lruvec_unlock{_irq, _irqrestore} Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2022-06-01 17:34 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-01 18:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-02 10:48 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-02 3:06 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of {folio,page}_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-20 6:13 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-20 7:14 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-06-01 17:34 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-02 4:14 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2022-06-19 20:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song
2022-05-30 21:17 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Andrew Morton
2022-05-31 2:26 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-31 2:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-31 2:41 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-31 7:29 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-09 2:43 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-09 2:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 3:09 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ypg5DhrXCEAazDE9@FVFYT0MHHV2J.googleapis.com \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox