From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88FAC43334 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2B2628D0001; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 06:41:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 239F76B0073; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 06:41:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 100F68D0001; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 06:41:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22DF6B0071 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 06:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDE28060D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:41:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79547468406.05.520B09A Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F26A8007F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:40:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654512061; x=1686048061; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uBOINfErOJIqGGYsvJJXD3GXR9aUYfYS+goj8jwst0E=; b=bJ3aS26+5dP6xlNC8ydK96YuHQBG8drJr/vv+k/O86u2CTLd9H179hwP RYiwQYYjX4doU03KzJY2ACQAzCPhyBeHou92wIdTwUG0qCk3ukPr4Wvqd lCd5YcxVNLGPQM6+JXVm/j/WLnYKu9LuaQ+fnxni6JP2SSne0dAUBU/0D yILkwxclwXnhpetXBCop8EklVL9xzG0R2WaN02v6JaI9YJ1+19eBTWsj5 +ZUMuZBToLQ4r9Ex546eDJoi0cAO3vNC8BT5gVSQxOcNRY5ULNYF0vyq9 94/6LO8gssfYsIUbTu0UI7FsZtJ+/yvi6kL1k0ebnbXBgTb4+j4Tel/LQ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10369"; a="276887949" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,280,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="276887949" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jun 2022 03:40:57 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,280,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="682198188" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jun 2022 03:40:54 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nyAAE-000UaM-TP; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 13:40:50 +0300 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 13:40:50 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: kernel test robot Cc: Sander Vanheule , Peter Zijlstra , Yury Norov , Andrew Morton , Valentin Schneider , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Marco Elver , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption Message-ID: References: <202206060858.wA0FOzRy-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202206060858.wA0FOzRy-lkp@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=bJ3aS26+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.65) smtp.mailfrom=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0F26A8007F X-Stat-Signature: tciynkn3a7pm1zf8hria613z6f7wjig4 X-HE-Tag: 1654512054-516959 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 08:48:05AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Sander, > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.18 next-20220603] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sander-Vanheule/cpumask-Fix-invalid-uniprocessor-assumptions/20220606-004959 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything > config: i386-randconfig-a009 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220606/202206060858.wA0FOzRy-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-1) 11.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/37b3f10c4604ea299b454f39ac5ba3cad903ae16 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Sander-Vanheule/cpumask-Fix-invalid-uniprocessor-assumptions/20220606-004959 > git checkout 37b3f10c4604ea299b454f39ac5ba3cad903ae16 > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > ld: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.o: in function `__cache_amd_cpumap_setup': > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c:890: undefined reference to `cpu_llc_shared_map' > >> ld: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c:895: undefined reference to `cpu_llc_shared_map' Seems like somewhere we need stubs for UP builds for those cache related functions. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko