From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: CGEL <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org,
oleksandr@natalenko.name, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>, Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn>,
Yunkai Zhang <zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn>,
Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each process
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 10:24:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoX+ps7fYFMqjQDq@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6285f983.1c69fb81.b0a8b.837f@mx.google.com>
On Thu 19-05-22 08:02:10, CGEL wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 09:35:30AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-05-22 06:23:30, CGEL wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:12:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Wed 18-05-22 02:47:06, CGEL wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:04:38PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > > [CCing Hugh and linux-api]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue 17-05-22 09:27:01, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > per mm but the actual implementation currently relies on the per-vma
> > > > > > flags. That means that one can explicitly disallow merging by madvise
> > > > > > for a range. Is it wise to override that by a per-process knob? I mean
> > > > > > there might be a very good reason why a particular memory ranges should
> > > > > > never be merged but a per-process knob could easily ignore that hint
> > > > > > from the application. Or am I just confuse?
> > > > > For now, there is no any hints for letting KSM never merge some memory
> > > > > ranges.
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure I understand. Could you be more specific?
> > >
> > > Not like THP, KSM doesn't have anything like VM_NOHUGEPAGE, so apps
> > > cann't explicitly disallow merging by madvise. If it is really necessary for
> > > a particular meory ranges of a process to be never merged, we have to submit
> > > one more patch to achieve that.
> >
> > What about MADV_UNMERGEABLE?
>
> MADV_UNMERGEABLE and MADV_MERGEABLE usually appear in pairs, MADV_UNMERGEABLE cannot
> appear alone.
That might be the case currently because KSM is an opt-in feature that
has to be explicitly enabled. The existing interface only allows to
enable it by MADV_MERGEABLE but now you are proposing an extension when
there would be other way to achieve the same (with a wider scope but
that is not really all that important). MADV_UNMERGEABLE has a well
defined behavior even on VMAs which are not marked for merging.
Let's say that somebody would like to use a process wide setup except
for few special mappings because merging is not really desirable for
whatever reason. How do you achieve that?
> I mean MADV_UNMERGEABLE is used to unmerges whatever it merged in the
> specifed range, not to disallow merging.
I disagree. It clearly drops the mergeable flag so it effectivelly disallow
merging.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 9:27 cgel.zte
2022-05-17 14:04 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-18 2:47 ` CGEL
2022-05-18 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-19 6:23 ` CGEL
2022-05-19 7:35 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-19 8:02 ` CGEL
2022-05-19 8:24 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2022-05-18 6:58 ` Balbir Singh
2022-05-18 7:40 ` [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each processg CGEL
2022-05-18 12:14 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-19 6:35 ` CGEL
2022-05-19 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-24 8:52 ` CGEL
2022-05-24 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-25 6:56 ` CGEL
2022-05-25 7:38 ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-18 14:31 ` [PATCH] mm/ksm: introduce ksm_enabled for each process Jann Horn
2022-05-19 3:39 ` CGEL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoX+ps7fYFMqjQDq@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
--cc=cgel.zte@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=wang.yong12@zte.com.cn \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox