From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
kernel@openvz.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: add ACCOUNT flag for allocations from marked slab caches
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 20:53:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoOMn+Cwwgz/hPnh@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fd21e25-b095-e055-fc2e-abda640a0575@openvz.org>
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:53:32PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> Slab caches marked with SLAB_ACCOUNT force accounting for every
> allocation from this cache even if __GFP_ACCOUNT flag is not passed.
> Unfortunately, at the moment this flag is not visible in ftrace output,
> and this makes it difficult to analyze the accounted allocations.
>
> This patch adds the __GFP_ACCOUNT flag for allocations from slab caches
> marked with SLAB_ACCOUNT to the ftrace output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 3 +++
> mm/slub.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 0edb474edef1..4c3da8dfcbdb 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3492,6 +3492,9 @@ void *__kmem_cache_alloc_lru(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct list_lru *lru,
> {
> void *ret = slab_alloc(cachep, lru, flags, cachep->object_size, _RET_IP_);
>
> + if (cachep->flags & SLAB_ACCOUNT)
> + flags |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
> +
> trace_kmem_cache_alloc(_RET_IP_, ret,
> cachep->object_size, cachep->size, flags);
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index ed5c2c03a47a..670bbfef9e49 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -3231,6 +3231,9 @@ void *__kmem_cache_alloc_lru(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
> {
> void *ret = slab_alloc(s, lru, gfpflags, _RET_IP_, s->object_size);
>
> + if (s->flags & SLAB_ACCOUNT)
> + gfpflags |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
> +
> trace_kmem_cache_alloc(_RET_IP_, ret, s->object_size,
> s->size, gfpflags);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
To me it sounds like it would confuse memory cgroup because:
1) For now objects are charged only in slab memcg hooks
2) This patch makes buddy allocator charge the page too
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 18:53 Vasily Averin
2022-05-16 19:10 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-05-16 21:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-16 22:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-17 3:49 ` Vasily Averin
2022-05-17 3:32 ` Vasily Averin
2022-05-17 3:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-17 11:53 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoOMn+Cwwgz/hPnh@hyeyoo \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kernel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vvs@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox